[TenTec] RF Speech Processor

[Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP]

Well we can't blame it all on the hams, though they are indeed a big piece
of the problem.
Our radios have slowly but surely gotten worse over the years and they too
are part of the problem.
Most radios today, including all TEN-TEC radios have just marginal
transmitters.

If you don't understand why, if you don't buy into this, then you have not
yet listened to Rob Sherwood's latest presentation (45 minutes) where he
explains a lot of this , and 'YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM'.

Just so you don't have to ask the question, here is a link to Rob's
presentation (again):
See:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SOf2OOGeGi8&feature=player_embedded 

73
Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Reed Krenn
Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2013 2:36 PM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] RF Speech Processor

That man has a *stranglehold* on reality!

Regards,

Reed WW3A


On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Bob McGraw - K4TAX
<RMcGraw at blomand.net>wrote:

> I recall a comment made to me recently by a very highlyl respected 
> audio and recording engineer.  "In the 70's we had talent.  Today we seem
to have
> only technology".   Perhaps that better explains what we hear on the bands
> today.
>
> 73
> Bob, K4TAX
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Rippey" <w3uls73 at gmail.com>
> To: <tentec at contesting.com>
> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 8:14 AM
> Subject: [TenTec] RF Speech Processor
>
>
>
>  Dave Hammond! I am so glad to see a posting by you on this thread! 
> Long
>> time no see. I always have read with interest what you have had to say.
>>
>> I will consider carefully what you, Bob and Gary have said. My sense 
>> is there is a lot that can be done (without splatter) to make 100 
>> watts work more effectively. NA1A 's video I mentioned is not 
>> conclusive but it does support the idea.
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> John, W3ULS
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/tentec<http://lists.co
>> ntesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec>
>>
>>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/tentec<http://lists.con
> testing.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec>
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec