[TenTec] mike

[Doug Reid]

Like I mentioned in an earlier post, there are many variables in choosing a mic to suit your needs.  That is why I have about 2 dozen different microphones in my recording studio.  Some voices sound great on most any kind of setup, others.....not so much.  

Doug WD4LNW


 -----Original Message-----
From: Bob McGraw - K4TAX <RMcGraw at Blomand.net>
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec at contesting.com>
Sent: Sun, Apr 20, 2014 7:39 pm
Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike



I use the 707 with the Omni VII and always get "great audio" reports.
Typical values:
SB TX BW    3000
X Roll Off      250
X EQ             0 dB
peech Processor    40%
IC GAIN             55% *
Value dependant on Hardware Mike gain.

3
ob, K4TAX

---- Original Message ----- 
rom: "Rodney" <w3krq at dejazzd.com>
o: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec at contesting.com>
ent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 6:27 PM
ubject: Re: [TenTec] mike

 hear my 707 on 1997 at 800 pm

 -----Original Message----- 
 From: Rodney Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 5:33 PM To: Discussion of 
 Ten-Tec Equipment Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike
 708 has more lowin more bass

 -----Original Message----- 
 From: Doug Reid
 Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 4:59 PM
 To: tentec at contesting.com
 Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike


 I agree with Bob's remarks.  The two microphones use the same element, but 
 achieve different results.

 Doug  WD4LNW



 -----Original Message-----
 From: Bob McGraw - K4TAX <RMcGraw at Blomand.net>
 To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec at contesting.com>
 Sent: Sun, Apr 20, 2014 4:45 pm
 Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike


 The configuration and not the element, i.e., mounting, vents, back loading
 nd such largely impact the response and more importantly the polar
 esponse.
 For that reason I prefer the 709 in place of the 708.  One is
 mnidirectional and one is unidirectional.
 73
 ob, K4TAX


 ---- Original Message ----- 
 rom: "Rodney" <w3krq at dejazzd.com>
 o: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec at contesting.com>
 ent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 8:17 PM
 ubject: Re: [TenTec] mike

 708 and 709 have the same element.

 -----Original Message----- 
 From: K3GHH Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 9:14 PM To:
 tentec at contesting.com Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike
 707 --> 709... I never see 708's mentioned, and that's what I have. What's
 the list's view of that mike? I'm a CW guy. Hope this isn't too far from
 the thread topic; Rodney's mention of these two skipping-over-708 mikes
 provoked the question.


 On 04/19/2014 08:15 PM, Bob McGraw - K4TAX wrote:
> Interesting approach.  Thanks.
>
> 73
> Bob, K4TAX
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rodney" <w3krq at dejazzd.com>
> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec at contesting.com>
> Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 6:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike
>
>
>> Radio ORION11    I had  tested my 709 and 707 with  ham's  that know me
>> and 6 ham's that don't know me did a ab test 709 was better every time
>> so I like the looks of the 707 so I traded the mike elements the 707 now
>> has the 709 and the 709 now has the 707 element.
>>
>> -----Original Message----- From: Bob McGraw - K4TAX
>> Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 7:48 PM
>> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike
>>
>> So what did you do?  And what radio are you using?
>>
>> 73
>> Bob, K4TAX
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rodney" <w3krq at dejazzd.com>
>> To: <tentec at contesting.com>
>> Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 5:50 PM
>> Subject: [TenTec] mike
>>
>>
>>> I made my 707 sound great.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TenTec mailing list
>>> TenTec at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>

 -- 
 -- John K3GHH

 _______________________________________________
 TenTec mailing list
 TenTec at contesting.com
 http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

 _______________________________________________
 TenTec mailing list
 TenTec at contesting.com
 http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


 ______________________________________________
 enTec mailing list
 enTec at contesting.com
 ttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

 _______________________________________________
 TenTec mailing list
 TenTec at contesting.com
 http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

 _______________________________________________
 TenTec mailing list
 TenTec at contesting.com
 http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

 _______________________________________________
 TenTec mailing list
 TenTec at contesting.com
 http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
 

______________________________________________
enTec mailing list
enTec at contesting.com
ttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec