[TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S

Ted Bryant w4nz at comcast.net
Mon Jul 7 14:18:52 EDT 2014


RIT is very useful in CW contesting where in the heat of battle stations
calling you may land on or near the edge of your passband.  Many radios like
the Orion, Orion II, TS590s and FT1000mp will accept software commands to
reset the RIT offset to zero.  That command can be put in your contest
logging program's QSL message (usually F3).  This way you never have to
worry about being off frequency for the next caller.

73, Ted W4NZ


-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Bob McGraw
- K4TAX
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2014 12:22 PM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S

It is much easier to use SPLIT.  Plus one knows directly the freq of their
TX and RX.

>From my take, every radio I've ever owned or used including others than
Tentec, the RIT function sucks!  I view it as a carry over from "CB
Clarifier" days.

73
Bob, K4TAX


----- Original Message -----
From: "Toby Pennington" <w4cakk at centurylink.net>
To: <tentec at contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2014 11:15 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S


>
> I work cw most all the time,   and the Eagle's RIT implementation sucks, 
> that plus another nit or two caused me to get rid of the Eagle,  although 
> the QSK cw was the best I have ever used,  and I liked the implementation 
> of the RF gain and low noise receiver. Toby K4NH
>
>
> On 7/7/2014 11:51 AM, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP wrote:
>> Push the button and count to 3.... in chinese!  ;-)
>>
>> Split is not difficult.  You don't even have to push the fUNC key.
>> The one that bugs me is RIT.
>>
>> 73 - Rick, DJ0IP
>> (Nr. Frankfurt am Main)
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of John
>> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2014 4:59 AM
>> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. TS-590S
>>
>> And, how does one engage SPLIT again in the Eagle....in the heat of 
>> battle?
>>
>> 73 John W4II



More information about the TenTec mailing list