[TenTec] QSK or not?
Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP
Rick at DJ0IP.de
Thu Mar 20 17:37:02 EDT 2014
Brian,
I never tried the 813. Heck they were end of life when I got licensed in
1962!
For lower power applications, I liked the 807 and 811A, but only for one or
two valves.
I'm not a great fan of paralleling multiple valves. They tend to pop like
firecrackers!
My limit is generally two valves!
I have never heard of the 805.
I especially like the 807 in liquid version!
(bet that woke some of you old timers up!)
Fb on the G3XLQ.
I'm still G5BMH, though I don't get much chance to operate from the UK, now
that I have retired.
I used to be in the UK nearly every week on business.
I was originally licensed in Reading in 1974 and was active in FD contest
with the Bracknel Radio Amateur Club (G4BRA).
73 - Rick, DJ0IP
(Nr. Frankfurt am Main)
-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of
bcarling at cfl.rr.com
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 10:12 PM
To: 'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'
Subject: Re: [TenTec] QSK or not?
Rick - I would say that the 813 is also a great valve.
You used to be able to buy them for $20.- 30 each not too long ago, but
because they are out of production ver few manufacturers still want to use
them.
805 used to be a rather fine bottle too.
Brian, AF4K (Ex-G3XLQ)
On 20 Mar 2014 at 20:40, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP wrote:
> Billy,
>
> When were you an SWL in DL? And where?
> I was also an SWL in DL as a kid.
> That was 1959 to 1962. QTH was Zweibrucken, near the French border.
> I would have gotten on the air but in Germany we had to be 18 and I
> was just a very early teenager.
>
> The relay trick you mentioned was indeed good. It effectively doubled
> the voltage applied to the T/R relay just for an instant, speeding it
> up considerably. It almost immediately reverted to normal voltage to
> prevent any damage to the relay. In fact, in consideration of the
> fact that TEN-TEC does not delay the first dit long enough for the
> Ameritron relays, it's a great idea to use this circuit with Ameritron
> amps (if you don't have the
> QSK-5 option).
>
> YES, the open frame relays are now a bit faster than they formerly
> were, but the current real life switching time, including settling
> time and/or delay added from reverse diode is "20mS". This was
> measured within the last 10 days on a brand new AL-80B by Bob, K4TAX.
>
> I agree the point on filtering to solve some of the PIN diode issues.
> However I guarantee you that you won't get anyone in our club (over
> 400
> members) to go back to PIN-Diode switching. Our club members are
> fanatics (as I used to be) and spend a lot of time and money planning
> their contest expeditions. In the past, PIN diodes caused us a lot of
> grief. Vacuum relays wear out after a long time, but they usually do not
die prematurely.
>
>
> Quality of tubes is a very serious problem. More than most people
realize.
> The only tube I really like besides the 3-500z and the 3CX-1200Z is
> the 572B. Recently, for several months RF Parts could not even
> deliver any decent 572Bs, and now they say "limited stock, please
> call". Good quality tubes are scarce. I still have one brand new (boxed)
3-500z from Amperex.
> I've had it for over 20 years - just in case. Based on my experience
> (sorry, there I go again - hi), that should cover my needs for the rest of
my life.
> I have to add that I do not abuse my amps. I run my 3-500z at about 600w.
> They last forever that way!
>
> 73 - Rick, DJ0IP
> (Nr. Frankfurt am Main)
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Billy
> Cox
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 8:02 PM
> To: Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP; 'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] QSK or not?
>
> Hi Rick, and I enjoy following your posts!
>
> I was a SWL in DL land as a kid and was amazed at some of the signals
> there, so do understand the challenges a wee bit, glad to know things
> are improving there.
>
> Several years ago I believe Ameritron did change the original (SLOW)
> relay to a newer design. As mine use the QSK board, which means the
> T/R relay is always in "T", I have not considered changing them out.
>
> Adding the QSK board was a cleaner/quicker option for me than as Gary
> mentioned in his post, adding someone's custom idea to an amp.
>
> One of the contest clubs, YCCC? came up with a way to speed the old
> stock relay but even that would NOT be fast enough for true QSK.
>
> Much of the PIN "QRM" can be addressed with filtering/bypassing, as
> SO2R has some of the same challenges as M/M with lots of close RF.
>
> The AL1200 is a good amp, not perfect and it's tube replacement cost
> continues to rise. So far, there's not been a need to have to do that yet.
>
> Probably the best tubes today for most of us, are either the 3-500Z
> new or the 8877 sourced as a reliable "pull". Sadly the quality of
> many other RF tubes has become an adventure in risk.
>
> That is all part of learning and understanding how things really work, ...
> or should/could work and that makes this hobby so enjoyable at times.
>
> (BTW, these posts regarding QSK are encouraging as to one more sign
> that CW is not going away.)
>
> Have a great weekend there Rick!
>
> 73 de Billy, AA4NU
>
> -----Original Message-----
> >From: Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP
> >Hi Billy,
> >
> >Nice to hear from you again. Indeed the AL-1200 is a wonderful
amplifier!
> >
> >I did say "my experience", and that is based on personal ownership as
> >well as lots of friends, members of my contest club, who had similar
> experience.
> >
> >BTW, it's more than $500 over here. Average? $500 is a fair comment.
> >
> >In addition we have always had a problem here in Europe with the
> >shortwave broadcast stations. You guys heard them, but they were 60
> >over 9 here, and the sum of the voltage hitting our rigs sometimes
> >caused the PIN-Diodes to cause IMD in the receivers. That not only
> >affected this type of amp, but also things like the Alpha amps. Our
> >club
> members got rid of them.
> >
> >Fortunately that Intermod problem has mostly gone away since the
> >broadcast stations moved outside of the 40m band...except of course
> >on-site of a multi-multi operation.
> >
> >The AL-1200 is indeed a lovely amplifier and would be my first choice
> >(by
> >far) if we were allowed 1500w here, but I would immediately throw out
> >its open-frame relay and install a decent vacuum relay. I wouldn't
> >mess around with the PIN-Diodes.
> >We are limited to just 750w, so I stick with the 3-500z.
> >
> >73 - Rick, DJ0IP
> >(Nr. Frankfurt am Main)
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> >Billy Cox
> >Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 5:41 PM
> >To: Billy Cox; Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment; 'Discussion of
> >Ten-Tec Equipment'
> >Subject: Re: [TenTec] QSK or not?
> >
> >Really Rick, that a rather subjective statement? So let's allow for
> >other's experiences too as I have run a pair of
> >AL-1200 amps here with the internal QSK board for over 20 years of
> >DXing and contesting QSOs, each driven by various brands/models of
> >gear and different guest ops with * NO * design related problems.
> >
> >So there's another subjective statement to ponder! B-) B-)
> >
> >... and it's NOT $500 here in the US, so let's be accurate to not
> >drift into more anti-Ameritron bashing. QSL OM?
> >
> >73 de Billy, AA4NU
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP
> >>Yes, you are correct, but when you add the terribly expensive
> >>external circuits, the amp no longer attempts to follow CW keying
> >>with its internal relay. The Ameritron amps can only run clean QSK
> >>with a $500 add-on, which my experience has been, are not real
> >>reliable. My experience is based on personal use for a few years,
> >>and knowledge of experience of several other members of my contesting
club.
> >>
> >>If you want to run QSK at more than about 10 wpm, it would be better
> >>to purchase an amplifier with a high speed T/R relay. There are
> >>plenty of them on the market.
> >>
> >>I personally switched to a QSK Technologies amplifier. In fact I
> >>bought two of them. Never had any problems with them.
> >>
> >>Today I only have an older Ameritron (clone), the SB-1000, and I
> >>just don't run "full" QSK. For contests I set the timing such that
> >>I can hear between words. IMO, there is no tangible loss of
> >>functionality compared to full QSK.
> >>For normal non-contest QSOs I run about 1 second hang delay, which
> >>helps me keep what little bit of sanity I still have left.
> >>
> >>73 - Rick, DJ0IP
> >>(Nr. Frankfurt am Main)
> >>
> >>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> >>Brian Carling
> >>Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 5:03 PM
> >>To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
> >>Subject: Re: [TenTec] QSK or not?
> >>
> >>Yes, but I think a lot of radio amateurs using good QSK Rigs like
> >>the Tentec have managed to convert their amplifiers for QSK
> >>operation by adding a circuitboard like the QSK 1500 or the QSK5.
> >>
> >>I realize that is more than just a simple homebrewer undertaking.
> >>
> >>Best regards - Bry Carling
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Mar 20, 2014, at 11:51 AM, "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP"
> >>wrote:
> >>>
> >>> It's not quite that simple, at least not always.
> >>>
> >>> "IF" your amplifier has a very fast T/R relay, such as a vacuum
> >>> relay, then you are correct; a few simple switching transistors
> >>> and a tiny relay will do the trick. But that only works when the
> >>> main T/R relay is fast enough to follow CW keying.
> >>>
> >>> If instead you have an amplifier whose T/R relay needs 20 mS to
> >>> switch, AND you connect the hand-shaking just as the Ten-Tec
> >>> keying loop normally works, the CW is not going to be very smooth.
> >>> Timing will get screwed up. The open-frame relays are just too
> >>> slow to do that. The only way to make them work is to have hang
> >>> delay such that they
> >>don't need to follow the keying.
> >>> The Ten-Tec hand-shaking does not do this.
> >>>
> >>> And then if you have to work with hang delay, you don't need the
> >>> complexity of the hand-shaking. You just need sufficient pre-dit
> >>> delay and adjustable hang delay - but you sacrifice true QSK.
> >>> TRUE QSK?
> >>> You never had it in the first place because you did not buy a QSK
> >>amplifier!
> >>>
> >>> No matter what you feed a mule or how you treat it, it will never
> >>> be a race horse!
> >>>
> >>> (On the other hand, not everybody needs or wants a race horse and
> >>> mules are wonderful animals!)
> >>>
> >>> 73 - Rick, DJ0IP
> >>> (Nr. Frankfurt am Main)
> >>>
> >>> -------------------------
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> >>> bcarling at cfl.rr.com
> >>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] QSK or not?
> >>>
> >>> I have to wonder why some guys will spend $500 for an external
> >>> accessory to do QSK with their linear amplifier. The system in my
> >>> TT
> >>> 422 is so simple. A couple of simple boards and a relay.
> >_______________________________________________
> >TenTec mailing list
> >TenTec at contesting.com
> >http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
More information about the TenTec
mailing list