[TenTec] Zepp?

[Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP]

This makes good sense, Gus. TNX.

I'm fairly certain Sevick did it the other way around.
I need to go re-read a couple of examples and check.

73 - Rick, DJ0IP
(Nr. Frankfurt am Main)

-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Augie "Gus"
Hansen
Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2014 3:13 AM
To: tentec at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Zepp?


On 9/13/2014 3:38 PM, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP wrote:
> ...
> Final note:  is it 4:1 or 1:4?  Gosh I don't know.
> Sevick defined it one way, but the vendors selling these devices call 
> it the other way.  Let's forget the semantics and specify exactly what 
> we are talking about: the 50 Ohm side is towards the TX and the 200 
> Ohm side is towards the antenna.

BALanced-to-UNbalanced
200-to-50

therefore, in this case, 4:1 balun in anything I write down or say about the
device.

Cheers,
Gus Hansen
KB0YH

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec