[TenTec] Transmitters...

Lee lee at wa3fiy.com
Thu Dec 10 13:05:23 EST 2015


That "TOR" spec is also important for we traffic operators who use 
Pactor.  Hmmmm....?  My present radios including Pegasus, Orion classic, 
Argonaut VI work very well on Pactor as I move scores of messages per 
month.  I wonder how these latency issues being discussed affect Pactor 
operation?  Hoping Ten-Tec keeps that in mind in new designs.

73,

-Lee-
WA3FIY

------ Original Message ------
From: "Ken N9VV" <n9vv at wowway.com>
To: "Kimberly Elmore" <cw_de_n5op at sbcglobal.net>; "Discussion of Ten-Tec 
Equipment" <tentec at contesting.com>
Sent: 12/10/2015 12:43:24 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Transmitters...

>*AND* The ARRL has removed the "TOR" (T/R time <=20ms) test for Pactor 
>and Amtor with very little comment. That was an important and essential 
>test data point for us CW operators. I am sorry to see it disappear 
>from their evaluations.
>
>72/73 de Ken N9VV
>



More information about the TenTec mailing list