[TenTec] Transmitters...

[Ken N9VV]

*AND* The ARRL has removed the "TOR" (T/R time <=20ms) test for Pactor 
and Amtor with very little comment. That was an important and essential 
test data point for us CW operators. I am sorry to see it disappear from 
their evaluations.

72/73 de Ken N9VV

On 12/10/2015 11:38 AM, Kimberly Elmore wrote:
> This harks back to something Rick touched on: Has anyone gone to the (considerable) trouble to compile what numbers they can about transmitter IMD performance (at least) and possibly phase noise from ARRL tests? That would be a long-term task and I think ARRL changed their phase noise test procedure a while back, so there may be apples and oranges mixed in. But, still, ARRL seems the only one to regularly test transmitters. Rob Sherwood does a fabulous job on receivers, but doesn't have equivalent data on transmitters.
> I can see why someone might not want to take on the liability for putting up numbers on a web page...
> Kim N5OP
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>