[TenTec] IC7300

[rick@dj0ip.de]

Barry, I'm not sure if the 6300 (entry level) is in that class.
It does not have the front bandpass filters that the 6500 and 6700 have.

73 - Rick, DJ0IP
(Nr. Frankfurt, Germany)



-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Barry N1EU
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 5:10 PM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] IC7300

I think the 16-bit ADC equipped direct sampling ANAN and Flex 6K receivers give up nothing to the O2/K3s.  FWIW, I've compared them all.  It's a matter of ergonomic preference as far as I'm concerned.  The receivers are all very impressive and not that different in terms of performance.  The
IC7300 is going to be a notch below them in rx performance.

Barry N1EU

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:30 AM, <gunnerjuulnyholm at me.com> wrote:

> Agree, Rick.
>
> My O2 is actually a SDR rig with a front end with roofing filtering 
> (IF-SDR). That front end selectivity and its dual rx’s sure makes it 
> expensive, but also in a class not obtainable (now) for a pure direct 
> conversion SDR. The DSP capabilities are impressive for both and a 
> great improvement.
> But I think my O2 (or a K3s) is sharper when hunting for that much 
> wanted prefix. - Like a Porsche will get you there quicker than a 
> Citroën, but at a price!
>
> 73, Gunner/OZ6NF
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec