[TOEC] [CCF] Q on SAC rules "ENN ###"

[Mikael Larsmark]

Hello

Because it is very irritating when losing points because of the other 
station being a lid or just just making an typing error. That is not 
your fault, you could not have done anything about it and still you get 
a penalty, I find that wrong.

So I much rather see the methods used for in example CQWW where the guy 
making the mistake gets the penalty. Because lets face it, there are 
very few qsos that are crossed off because of the TX station making an 
error compared to the RX station.

And about abbreviations I really hate those too. I believe it causes 
more confusion and repeats than it actually gives you a faster rate. I 
can get using T and N to some extent, but not like A5NT for 1590.

Mike, SM2WMV (SJ2W)
M/S in SAC CW from SJ2W; http://www.sj2w.se/contest/

On 09/13/2011 08:28 PM, Mats Strandberg wrote:
> The adjustment of the speed to that both QRQ BIG GUNS and the QRS small
> pistols can copy both the call and the exchange is a thrilling challenge
> that requires quite awake operators... so I am not so sure if it so easy to
> say that "I am not responsible for the other stations miscopying"....
>
> I personally do not see the "CONS" in the Russian school of log checking....
> and also not the advantages in the US approach.  Can someone enlight me a
> bit?
>
> 73 de Mats