Topband: Fwd: RE: [digitalradio] Info on previous post about SCAMP
Bill Aycock
baycock at direcway.com
Tue Dec 28 12:55:36 EST 2004
>Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 19:15:38 -0600
>From: Rick Williams <mrfarm at mwt.net>
>Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Info on previous post about SCAMP
>X-Sender: mrfarm at mwt.net
>To: digitalradio at yahoogroups.com
>Reply-to: digitalradio at yahoogroups.com
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
>Importance: Normal
>Delivered-to: mailing list digitalradio at yahoogroups.com
>Mailing-List: list digitalradio at yahoogroups.com; contact
> digitalradio-owner at yahoogroups.com
>X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: groups-email
>X-Apparently-To: digitalradio at yahoogroups.com
>X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 207.190.94.2
>X-Yahoo-Profile: kv9u
>List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:digitalradio-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com>
>Original-recipient: rfc822;baycock at direcway.com
>X-NAS-Language: English
>X-NAS-Bayes: #0: 0; #1: 1
>X-NAS-Classification: 0
>X-NAS-MessageID: 8488
>X-NAS-Validation: {81968E2F-8E64-4C01-B9A6-72BEECC86F82}
>
>
>
>Mark, N5RFX wrote:
>
> >>>> There are no bandwidths enumerated in part 97. RDFT is not an FSK
>mode, so
>in Part 97 305(f)(3) only "the symbol rate must not exceed 300 bauds"
>clause applies.
>
>====
>
>Here in the U.S. most all the HF bands have that division between the
>cw/data portion and the phone/image portion. But a surprise to me is that
>when I looked up Part 97 that you indicated above, I realized that there is
>one band we can use cw/dat/phone/image across the entire band!
>
>This means that you could use mixed phone and digital data or image on at
>least one band. I am set up for a modest 160 meter station here and have a
>couple of antennas to play with. Perhaps some of us could try this out in
>the future.
>
>Although I asked to be a participant in the alpha testing of SCAMP but was
>not selected, I do expect to be able to try beta testing some time in the
>next few months. So this could be interesting to see how it would handle the
>noise issues and the generally sub-optimum antennas that are common on 160.
>
>Oh yes, for that matter, I would be interested in trying other modes on 160
>as well or other bands too.
>
>73,
>
>Rick, KV9U
>
>
>
>
>------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
>Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
>Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
>http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM
>--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
>
>DIGITAL RADIO (part of the Cyber Amateur Radio Club - CARC)
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
><*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/
>
><*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> digitalradio-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
>
><*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
Bill Aycock - W4BSG
Woodville, Alabama
More information about the Topband
mailing list