Topband: CQ 160 weird ideas
Dave Sharred
g3nkc at yahoo.co.uk
Fri Jan 16 09:06:53 EST 2009
Tree
I think that your idea is a bad one, if you don't mind me saying so !
The flaw with splits like this is that you might hold your run freq, since
there is no-one else there; but you will never hold your QSX freq!
Or, you will specify a freq that you think is clear, and may not be ; and
"force" your callers to QRM someone else!
In EU, it is a fact that you need to keep the exchanges as short as poss
with weak stations (ie JA or BY); we ALWAYS run the risk of someone jumping
in and trying to steal your freq; between exchanges!
If you really want to try something different, with the aim of working EU; I
would just work co-channel higher in the band (i.e. 1870 - 1880). it is
never as densely populated there (from the EU perspective); and always much
easier to pick out weaker folks ! Dave, KY1V, elected to do this BTW when I
was at 6Y1V for the SSB leg; so I know from "over the pond" that there are
freq's available higher up the band; the EU will find you !
You may have a problem of course with some countries with frequency
restrictions...
See you in the test !
73
Dave
G3NKC // MD4K
More information about the Topband
mailing list