Topband: 160m in RTTY Contests

IronmanY2k IronmanY2K at triathlete.com
Sat Oct 31 14:04:35 PDT 2009


I agree with Tom. There is no reason not to have a RTTY contest or two 
each year on 160M.  We all know that 160 Meters is a challenge and some 
of us look forward to the challenge of 160 Meter RTTY.  I fully support 
the idea.  I also recommended a scoring system like the Stew Perry 
contest.  

73, Jim
AD6WL


 

>>>>>>>> I'm all for RTTY contests on 160 meters. CW and SSB contests 
occur on 160 
meters so why not digital?!

I've been a regular operator on 160 meters for 20 years and have watched 
the 
band go from crowded to virtually and empty wasteland, mainly due to 
many
hams becoming SK's and/or moving into assisted living facilities. I 
believe 
in the concept of use the bands or lose the bands.

I'm retired and have time to be a full time ham and can tell you that 
all 
the MF/HF bands they are very underutilized during the work week and not 
very
busy on the weekends when no contests are scheduled. Weekend contests 
populate otherwise empty bands, a good argument for contesting.

Just my .04 cents (due to inflation).

73 & GUD DX,
Thomas F. Giella, NZ4O
Lakeland, FL, USA
nz4o at arrl.net

COL LF/MF/HF/VHF/UHF Frequency Radiowave Propagation Email Reflector: 
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/spaceweather



_____________________________________________________________
YourName at Triathlete.com email addresses at http://www.Triathlete.com


More information about the Topband mailing list