Topband: Lab style comparison results on 160m small lot antenna changes.

[Mike Waters]

Dave,

I have a lot of faith in NEC and N6LF's work, also. But I think the testing
is required partly because we cannot successfully model Guy's folded
counterpoise in NEC to determine the changes in ground loss, etc.

I would love to remote-switch between a few elevated radials and an FCP
under an inverted-L here at my QTH.

73, Mike
www.w0btu.com

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:21 AM, DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9 at gmail.com>wrote:

> Guy,
>
> why must we continually test NEC against measurements? The work by N6LF has
> shown great correlation between simulation and the real world.
>
> Those of us who design electronic circuits (including EM) in the world of
> computer simulation have great faith in the various programs and NEC-4 (and
> possibly NEC-2) should give us an adequate A-B comparison.
>
>         Dave WX7G
>