Topband: K6STI low noise receive loop
James Rodenkirch
rodenkirch_llc at msn.com
Tue Oct 2 15:43:13 EDT 2012
And, in my case, Don, I simply need to put up an antenna that's: a) more efficient than my vertical and b) fits within the confines of my property....having any noise cancelling or nulling is a plus but not as important as a and b (b being the huge limiter)
> To: rodenkirch_llc at msn.com; w8ji at w8ji.com; topband at contesting.com
> From: wd8dsb at aol.com
> Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 15:31:03 -0400
> Subject: Re: Topband: K6STI low noise receive loop
>
>
>
>
> "there is no "modeling" associated with this effort."
>
> Jim,
>
> I took a look at the article today and also threw together a basic (simple) EZNEC model and my generated elevation pattern closely resembles the pattern that they published (fig 6) in QST back in 1995. On 160 meters the elevation pattern shows max gain at 44 deg and 43 deg on 80 meters. RDF is not spectacular, but depending on where the noise is coming from (as well as the signal of interest) it might do well. Looks like it does best when noise is arriving at a very low angle, or at a very high angle.
>
> After trying lots of things on a small lot, I personally am convinced that I need to go with phased flags or short phased verticals (like a Hi-Z system) in an attempt to maximize RDF along with a reasonably low angle of radiation (for DX).
>
> 73's
> Don (wd8dsb)
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
More information about the Topband
mailing list