Topband: Monopole Elev Pattern w.r.t. Earth Conductivity
Tom W8JI
w8ji at w8ji.com
Wed Oct 24 18:18:27 EDT 2012
> I A-B or A-B-C tested several antennas, including a low dipole, the high
> dipole, an element from my four square, a ~318 foot insulated tower
> vertical, and I think my tall omni vertical was about 190 feet at that
> time.
>
> The tall vertical tower was definitely worse compared to shorter
> verticals, and had almost no short skip signal around Georgia. I had
> isolation chokes for lights and a base insulator, but that 300+ foot tower
> was so poor I never used it as a vertical.
That may have been confusing. I never got in the habit of calling my 300ft +
insulated tower a tall vertical, because I always considered it a support.
It did have isolation chokes for cables and lights and a base insulator. It
worked its way up in height from doing radial tests until it eventually
reached ~318 feet.
The vertical I call a tall vertical has always been a 180-200 ft insulated
vertical, so it is not really the tallest vertical. It was just the one that
worked best as a tall vertical.
The really tall tower was so poor for overall use I just grounded the base
when I rebuilt it with Rohn 65G a few years ago, so now it is no longer
available as a series-fed structure. It has a ground system around it that
allows other test antennas, and for a while I had two four squares. Since
the 300 ft gets hit by lightning at least once in every storm, it is too
much trouble to have cables run out to a four square with ground radials.
Lightning current melted an LMR400 cable shield every other storm.
More information about the Topband
mailing list