Topband: trees and antennas

Jon Zaimes AA1K jz73 at verizon.net
Mon Aug 5 08:52:53 EDT 2013


My QTH in central Delaware is about 12 acres with most of it a "young" 
forest of loblolly pines, oak and maple that top out around 80-90 feet 
tall. Prior to 1978 or so most of this was cleared farmland.

In 1998 I erected a 100-foot tower that became the (series-fed) driven 
element for a 160-meter K3LR-style parasitic array. This tower was 
amidst a grove of about a dozen or so loblolly pines that at the time 
were about 40 feet tall. Since then they have grown to around 60-70 
feet. I did make a change in the tower top-loading a few years ago that 
required changing the matching at the feedpoint, but other than that 
change I have not found any need to readjust the matching over time that 
I would think would be needed if there was any interaction with the 
trees. This antenna (3 elements to the SE/SW/NW and 4 elements to the 
NE) has seemed competitive with other arrays on the band at inland 
locations.

My new 4-el bs/ef tx array for ne/sw on 160 also is built in the forest 
and performs well (as expected slightly more gain than the parasitic 
array to the NE). These elements are only 73 feet tall and below the 
treetops in that area. They are each different distances from the 
closest trees yet I didn't see any significant variation in resonance of 
the antennas.

One possible tree-antenna interaction I have seen is with copper ground 
rods. In at least two cases where I used a large loblolly pine as an end 
support for a Beverage antenna and drove in a 5-foot copper pipe for a 
ground rod next to the tree, the tree later died. Loblolly pines have a 
deep tap root, and copper is known to kill vegetation, so I've since 
started using galvanized steel for ground rods when they need to be near 
these trees.

73/Jon AA1K


More information about the Topband mailing list