Topband: Are stacked verticals feasible?

Tom W8JI w8ji at w8ji.com
Sat Sep 7 01:17:20 EDT 2013


> On 09/06/2013 09:26 AM, ZR wrote:
>> I would think that at 6-12' spacing from the tower it would minimize 
>> interaction on 160 or 80?
>
> I don't know, Carl. I'll leave it to the experts. What I do know is I have 
> made several attempts to erect a vertical for 80 meters near my 160 meter 
> tower, using the same radial system. At 10 foot spacing from the tower, 
> the base resistance of an 80 meter quarter wave vertical was less than 5 
> ohms. That to me suggests significant interaction with the tower. At 5 
> foot spacing the base resistance was less than 2 ohms!

Well let's think about that.

10 feet on 160 is exactly like 1.5 inches on 2 meters.

Anyone really think  a two meter whip 1.5 inches away from another antenna 
or tower would have minimal interaction?

Actually, 10 feet isn't even minimal interaction on six meters, let alone on 
160 meters.

I've been all through this collinear stuff and skirt collinear vertical 
stuff trying to multiband vertical antennas. I even had a 100 foot insulated 
base tower with a 33 foot skirt, trying to feed it like a collinear on 40 
meters. I tried things with WXEZ FM when they had a 355 foot tower in a 
swamp, I tried things on my towers.

All of that stuff goes into the bag of "it was a good sounding idea, but a 
big waste of time". The reality check, even if you have an insulated tower, 
is:

1.) Really low wave angles stink on 160 meters most of the time

2.) There isn't that much gain there, because we are forcing the field down 
against earth. Saltwater would be a different thing, as would freespace.

3.) There isn't that much gain there, because the extra antenna is forcing a 
null (removing power to use at low angles) where a null already exists

4.) As I recall, the optimum current ratio in my 40 meter skirt collinear 
vertical was around 1.5 or 2:1, with most of the current in the 33 foot 
skirt. Despite all the effort, it worked much worse than a 40 meter dipole 
at 80 feet.

5.) My insulated base 318-foot tower was such a useless 160 antenna, I 
removed and discarded the insulator. It's just a tower now, to hold up 
horizontal and VHF/UHF antennas. This is the same stuff that happened to 
W8LT with their balloon or kitetoon antennas over acres of aluminum sheet 
groundplane.

73 Tom





More information about the Topband mailing list