Topband: Still in search of resonance - BTW Resonance

[Charlie Cunningham]

Well, of course not, Tom! I need to be more precise and keep in mind the
"audience" on this Reflector, and that you are always lrking out thereinthe
weeds to chide and chastise me! :-) Of course devices that are pure real
over the frequency range of interest would not be resonant!  I guess I was
thinking of the more general case.like Carl's gamm match whose impedance
would consist of a real and imaginary part, in which case I stand by my
assertion.  Touche!  Mea culpa!  :-)

73,
Charlie, K4OTV



-----Original Message-----
From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Tom W8JI
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 9:10 PM
To: Charlie Cunningham; 'Carl Braun'; 'Joe Subich, W4TV'
Cc: topband at contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Still in search of resonance - BTW Resonance

Subject: Re: Topband: Still in search of resonance - BTW Resonance


BTW "Resonance" =>  X=0 or jX = j0>>>

So my dummy load is resonant, and the resistors in my resistor bins are all 
resonant?   :-) 

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband