Topband: Rig Question

[W7RH]

Much of the discussion of todays transceivers is like comparing apples 
to apples. My situation did not require a big box status symbol with 
over a hundred button features. My requirements were standard 
communications interface ala serial, USB or Ethernet control with a 
decent receiver. Sub menus via computer screen.

My ten year remote project started  before K3 days and most 
manufacturers could not satisfy the above requirement without silly 
interface boxes. Many of those who had the specific features had lack 
luster firmware and software control. My interest in remote operation 
due to big city life and restrictions fueled my multiscreen computer 
control and I ended up with a Kenwood TS480 with the narrow 270 Hz cw 
filter option.

DXing is a casual operation for me and separate simple SDR with loop is 
used for basic split frequency operation. Proper adjustment of the 
attenuator, RF gain and ALC is the key to this radio specific 
performance. Dual receive diversity is through a simple audio mixer and 
really is seldom used.

My option is not for everyone. However, with the typical longtime ham 
station for seasoned low bander or contester in the price range of a 
couple of Harleys or nice BMW it is not out of sight.

The bottom line. A simple transceiver with quiet location and good 
antenna works for me. If you can't hear them you can't work them no 
matter what you spend.

73,
Bob W7RH

http://w7rh.net


-- 
W7RH DM35OS

Some people regard private enterprise as a predatory tiger to be shot. Others look on it as a cow they can milk. Not enough people see it as a healthy horse, pulling a sturdy wagon.
Winston Churchill