Topband: WD-1A wire
Dave Blaschke, w5un
w5un at wt.net
Sun Jun 7 19:47:10 EDT 2015
I've used WD-1A wire here for years for my Beverages, which are all over
600' long. The receiver preamp handles loss OK in the forward
direction. In the reverse direction I use a W7IUV external preamp due to
extra signal loss. This is no problem on 160 or 80 meters.
Be careful with this wire, as if the insulation gets scraped somewhere
along the antenna the iron core will rust through and the copper wires
can then open. This has happened to me on several occasions.
Dave, W5UN
On 6/7/2015 4:40 PM, K1FZ-Bruce wrote:
>
> A lot are using it Roger, The I squared R losses are low because
> signal currents levels are so low..
> Especially for BOG antennas, the physical strength often outweighs
> the loss.
> I am using it for a 300 foot 2 wire switchable Beverage & works well.
> For real long Beverages, maybe a better wire should be considered.
> 73
> Bruce-K1FZ
>
> www.qsl.net/k1fz/bogantennanotes.html
>
>
> On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 15:55:59 +0000 (UTC), Roger Parsons via Topband
> wrote:
>
> I know that WD-1 and WD-1A wires are not very good for two wire
> transmission lines due to their high attenuation. I wonder however
> whether they are OK with the conductors strapped as Beverage wires?
> WD-1A has quite a few advantages for the bush where I run my antennas
> - it is strong, it is quite light, it is very nice and easy to run
> out, and it fits through electric fence insulators.
> I presume that its poor performance as a balanced line is related to
> the copper wires twisting with the steel ones meaning that for some of
> the time current is passing through the steel wires due to skin
> effect. On the other hand I can't see how it can be worse than
> galvanised steel wire or electric fence wire.
> 73 Roger
> VE3ZI
> _________________
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>
>
> _________________
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
More information about the Topband
mailing list