Topband: Received Signal Strengths
gudguyham at aol.com
Sat Jan 9 21:42:01 EST 2016
Give me an S1 and I won't answer any more of you CQ's. So there!
Sent from AOL Mobile Mail
From: Tom W8JI <w8ji at w8ji.com>
To: Steve Flood <kk7uv at bresnan.net>
Cc: Topband <Topband at contesting.com>
Sent: Sat, Jan 9, 2016 12:16 PM
Subject: Re: Topband: Received Signal Strengths
>>> marks on a rubber band.
> Great analogy Tom. If I were truthful with the signal reports for most
> the topband DX worked here, using the S-meter with RX loops, I would be
> sending "209".
I don't know how to really express it, but our S meters have index marks
that say the same thing but all read (because of many variables) different
It's like have voltmeters where on some meters 1 volt is .529 volts and on
others one volt is 8.7 volts. It isn't just the receiver (which are poor
enough), it is the IF filter, local noise, antenna gain, and everything
If we dispense with the S meter and go by ear, it can get even worse. I
don't anyone who can listen to a receiver without looking at an S meter and
tell levels from one through nine based on sound.
Why anyone would criticize other people or contests for something we should
all know is either next to meaningless at worse, or cannot ever be accurate
at best, is beyond my comprehension.
If you like the guy, give him an S9. If you don't, tell him he is S1.
Topband Reflector Archives - <a href="http://www.contesting.com/_topband" target="_blank">http://www.contesting.com/_topband</a>
More information about the Topband