Topband: Soil conductivity maps

daraymond at iowatelecom.net daraymond at iowatelecom.net
Sun Apr 1 23:12:28 EDT 2018


If you are interested in topband propagation. . .being located in the north, 
or at least the north central part, is not the optimum place to be.  Being 
on topband here in Iowa for the past three decades, I can attest that those 
to the south of me (even Missouri) enjoy consistently better prop to both EU 
and Asia.  Here in the upper midwest we are constantly fighting the aurora 
oval.  I am forever hearing guys roughly near my longitude but 400 - 1000 
miles to the south working things that I cannot even detect.          73. . 
. Dave, W0FLS

-----Original Message----- 
From: Brian Pease
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2018 1:58 PM
To: topband at contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Soil conductivity maps

Another bit of advice is to move as far north as you can stand, because
up here the population is steady or declining as folks migrate away from
the snow belt.

On 4/1/2018 2:31 PM, HP wrote:
> My first priority would be a RF quiet location and best prospects of it 
> staying
> that way - Been in same house over 40 years - last ten years in particular
> ambient noise and incredible numbers of ever increasing RFI sources
> overwhelm my ability to try to resolve . I was on edge of town , pitch 
> black
> at night - little 2 lane road from downtown on other side of mountain 
> preserve .
> Now 8 lane freeway 400 feet away (because the millionaires and political
> influence got the proposed freeway route moved from their area) Houses ,
> shopping centers etc as far as you can see - sea of lights and RF noise.
>
> Just sayin ...... If you can't hear 'em you can't work 'em.... well RHR 
> etc .
>
> Hank K7HP
>
>> On 4/1/2018 7:45 AM, Jeff Kinzli N6GQ wrote:
>>> So I'm looking to purchase a new QTH. I'm not particular about
>>> location, but would like to optimize for soil conductivity and any
>>> other parameters that would increase near and far field propagation
>>> and minimize ground losses. I've seen the US Gov M3 maps, but they are
>>> very coarse. They also only define conductivity, and I'm wondering
>>> what other quantities would be useful to look at.
> _________________
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband 



More information about the Topband mailing list