Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters

[uy0zg]

Yes

" Here you can query Logbook to find out the last time log data was 
uploaded for a particular call sign.
Last upload for OK1YQ: No log data found "

Nick, UY0ZG


Clive GM3POI писал 2018-11-17 15:37:
> There have been no uploads for OK1YQ therefore it all has to be cards. 
> 73
> Clive GM3POI
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> n4is at n4is.com
> Sent: 17 November 2018 13:29
> To: w5zn at w5zn.org; 'topband'
> Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
> 
> Hi Joel
> 
> I have the same impression as Bill mentioned. 160m paper QSL requires a 
> card
> checker, however LOTW confirmation does not have the same process, no 
> QSO or
> QSL check at all. We've seen 160m " QSO's"  on Club Log  and subsequent
> confirmation on LOTW on plain day light.
> 
> 73's
> JC
> N4IS
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Topband <topband-bounces at contesting.com> On Behalf Of 
> w5zn at w5zn.org
> Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2018 8:12 AM
> To: topband <topband at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
> 
> Folks - I'm not exactly understanding the LoTW comments on this thread.
> If it is referring to the LoTW screen shot totals listed by OK1RD on 
> his
> website then that is the combined totals in his DXCC record, not the 
> totals
> confirmed solely via LoTW so a "hack" has not necessarily occurred.
> 
> Regardless, there is convincing evidence some bogus QSL cards were 
> reviewed
> and accepted by a DXCC card checker somewhere and then entered into his 
> DXCC
> record!
> 
> 73 Joel W5ZN
> 
> On 2018-11-17 05:29, Bill Tippett wrote:
>>>> Doesn't say much for the DXCC checking process either.  73 Clive
>>>> GM3POI
>> 
>> 
>> Guys this was probably done by OK1RD to embarrass ARRL/DXCC, in
>> retaliation
>> 
>> for ARRL (correctly) removing his bogus listing over 10 years ago.  He
>> 
>> probably found a way to hack LOTW and no human monitored the result.
>> I'm
>> 
>> sure they will correct the listing but it does raise some serious
>> issues
>> 
>> about the security of their system.
>> 
>> 
>> 73,  Bill  W4ZV