Topband: Temporary antenna suggestion for 160
wes_n7ws at triconet.org
Sun Dec 15 22:33:28 EST 2019
So you suggest giving up 10 feet of a 45 foot vertical in order to raise the
radials? Doesn't make sense to me.
With a 45' tower I supported an inverted-V and worked my first 70+ countries on
160 from the depths of southern AZ.
On 12/15/2019 7:22 PM, Mike Waters wrote:
> Do the inverted-L, but use at least two 10' high 1/4 wave radials.
> Do NOT use an RF ground rod, or any radials on or near the earth. Just
> connect the coax shield to the junction of the radials and any remote
> tuner. At that point a good choke balun is necessary.
> Leaving out the choke or grounding the shield will result in very poor
> 73, Mike
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2019, 7:04 PM thoyer via Topband <topband at contesting.com>
>> With only 9 more to go for DXCC on 160 and all of the recent posts about
>> good the band has been recently "best in years....) I find myself with no
>> antenna for the low bands and cringing after each post on how good the band
>> has been.
>> Options - I have a 45' tower with TH6DXX, 6m and 2m yagis. I could easily
>> string a makeshift inverted L with about 45' vertical and around 100'
>> horizontal. This I could string up in a few hours. the Horizontal portion
>> would be pointed south. Not the best of configurations but that's what I
>> have to work with. ...
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
More information about the Topband