FW: [TowerTalk] New York Times Article

Scandurra,Anthony AnthonyScandurra@FirstUSA.com
Tue, 10 Mar 1998 10:17:59 -0500



Anthony Scandurra
UNIX System Administrator - FileNET Systems
Phone: (302)434-7655
Fax: (302)594-4020
Email: AnthonyScandurra@FirstUSA.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Scandurra,Anthony 
> Sent:	Tuesday, March 10, 1998 10:10 AM
> To:	'Roger L. Elowitz'
> Subject:	RE: [TowerTalk] New York Times Article
> 
> Looks like someone has decided to "spoof" me. For the record, as I
> said before, I enjoyed the article and encourage those with friends
> considering joining our hobby to read this article. It is most
> favorable.
> 
> Roger, I received your private email thanking me for my comments on
> the article. You are welcome.
> 
> 73,
> 
> Anthony Scandurra
> UNIX System Administrator - FileNET Systems
> Phone: (302)434-7655
> Fax: (302)594-4020
> Email: AnthonyScandurra@FirstUSA.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Roger L. Elowitz [SMTP:K2JAS@worldnet.att.net]
> Sent:	Monday, March 09, 1998 7:33 PM
> To:	Scandurra,Anthony
> Subject:	RE: [TowerTalk] New York Times Article
> 
> Hey, 
> It's something to read.  You got something better? 
> 
> At 02:09 PM 3/9/98 -0700, you wrote: 
> >>>>  
> 	more qrm...shit 
> 
> 	You're right, Roger. It's a great article. So good, in fact,
> that I am 
> 	probably going to send the link to a few friends who are "on the
> fence" 
> 	about getting their ticket. 
> 
> 	Anthony Scandurra - KG2MY 
> 	UNIX System Administrator - FileNET Systems 
> 	Phone: (302)434-7655 
> 	Fax: (302)594-4020 
> 	Email: AnthonyScandurra@FirstUSA.com 
> 
> 	> -----Original Message----- 
> 	> From:	Roger L. Elowitz [SMTP:K2JAS@worldnet.att.net] 
> 	> Sent:	Monday, March 09, 1998 3:49 PM 
> 	> To:	towertalk@contesting.com 
> 	> Subject:	[TowerTalk] New York Times Article 
> 	>  
> 	> Hi Gang, 
> 	>  
> 	> We've recently read in this esteemed forum posts decrying the
> New  York 
> 	> Times article that contained several inaccuracies. What
> appears to be 
> 	> missed is that in spite of these glaring errors (glaring to us
> at 
> 	> least) 
> 	> the article is a much needed bit of positive publicity.  
> 	>  
> 	> You are invited to read the article on-line for yourselves and
> make  up 
> 	> your 
> 	> own minds as to it's merits.... always a good thing. Go
> to...... 
> 	>  
> 	>
> http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/98/03/circuits/articles/05ham-radi
> 
> 	> o.html 
> 	>  
> 	> It's an interesting read and I highly recommend it to you. 
> 	>  
> 	> Roger, K2JAS/4 
> 	>  
> 	> -- 
> 	> FAQ on WWW:
> http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html 
> 	> Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com 
> 	> Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com 
> 	> Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com 
> 	> Search:
> http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search 
> 
> 	-- 
> 	FAQ on WWW:
> http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html 
> 	Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com 
> 	Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com 
> 	Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com 
> 	Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> <<<< 

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search