[TowerTalk] A Sad Precedent

GALE STEWARD k3nd@yahoo.com
Tue, 23 Feb 1999 13:31:24 -0800 (PST)





Think your missing the point.  It sets a dangerous precedent for tower
owners (US)!  If your neighbors decide they don't like your tower for
whatever reason, whether proved or not, they can sue and guess where
your tower will end up? Not up!




---"Alan D. Gray"  wrote:
>
> 
> Greedy Attorneys?... Some advice: lose that "line of reasoning" when
you ask
> your attorney to defend you when you're sued by your neighbor  when he
> take's issue with your tower.
> 
> Instigators?...Guess they had no right to complain if the cell tower
lowered
> their property value?  A big corporation profits while they
lose...seems
> fair, right? ,,,and after all, it wasn't next to your house!
> 
> Jurors? .... Guess they knew less about this whole mess than we do;
after
> all, we read all about it in the newspaper, so we were the ones that
saw all
> of the evidence in an unbiased light (naw, newspapers never leave
out any of
> the details).  Couldn't have been more to it....
> 
> Alan, W3BV
 
 

_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm