[TowerTalk] A Sad Precedent

[Tom Rauch]

> Think your missing the point.  It sets a dangerous precedent for tower
> owners (US)!  If your neighbors decide they don't like your tower for
> whatever reason, whether proved or not, they can sue and guess where
> your tower will end up? Not up!

What a world. 

I refused to help a lawyer from California who wanted to illegally 
use an amplifier to communicate in the ham bands with his 
amplifier, and he threatened the manufacturer with a lawsuit for 
"mental anguish" (among other things).

This tower thing is just as stupid. Property devaluation is one thing, 
but mental distress? Nonsense. I sure hope they fight this one 
through appeals processes, I'm sure it would be overturned.


73, Tom W8JI
w8ji@contesting.com

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm