[TowerTalk] Re: G-800
Mike Holley
mholley@quik.com
Sun, 28 Feb 1999 23:58:42 -0800
As I plan to replace the destroyed (Now R.I.P.) G-800 rotor with a resurrected
and restored elderly HAM IV rotor I would also like to know if this rotor will
be capable of servicing a full size 20 mtr mono band (HAM-PRO H20-4) Similar in
size to a 204B .
Thank you Mike VE7AVM
"Tommy Tow, WD4K" wrote:
> As usual, a very informative discussion. Now I am curious. Do any other
> manufacturers publish a K factor or equivalent rating? Is it clearly
> identifiable in their fact sheets or do we have to use our own
> interpretation and math to determine the correct rating? Anybody know off
> hand what the ratings are for the Ham 4 family of rotators?? Tks Tommy
> WD4K
> -----Original Message-----
> From: K7LXC@aol.com <K7LXC@aol.com>
> To: mholley@quik.com <mholley@quik.com>
> Cc: cmyaesu@worldnet.att.net <cmyaesu@worldnet.att.net>;
> towertalk@contesting.com <towertalk@contesting.com>
> Date: Sunday, February 28, 1999 7:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Re: G-800
>
> >
> >In a message dated 99-02-28 20:13:42 EST, mholley@quik.com writes:
> >
> >> This above para that I am confused about ,I have YAESU stand alone
> brochure
> >> which
> >> I got just prior to the purchase of the G-800SDX (1994) which gives the
> >> following
> >> data:-
> >> Power consumption : 100VA
> >> 450 deg rotation time : (S)55s
> >> (SDX)43-93s)
> >> Rotation torque:
> 600-
> >> 1100kg-cm
> >> (43-79 ft lbs
> >> Stationary torque: 4000
> >> kg-cm (288ft-lbs)
> >> Max. vertical load : 200
> >> kg (440 lbs)
> >> Max.ant. surface area : 2 m
> sq.
> >> mast diameter:
> 38-63
> >> mm (1 1/2-2 1/2 in.)
> >> Do I assume that the "K" factor is a product of one or a number of the
> >above
> >> specifications ?
> >
> >Hi, Mike --
> >
> > My apologies. Apparently Yaesu did not institute the K Factor when
> you
> >bought your rotator. Like I said before, it has been a relatively recent
> >development.
> >
> > If you bought your rotator prior to introduction of the K Factor, then
> >I'd say you didn't have the benefit of current thinking and specs. If
> that's
> >the case, then I'd say that you got 5 years of service from your rotator
> and
> >then it bit the dust. I personally give rotators 6 years of service so
> while
> >it was unfortunate that yours failed, it was not unusual and, in fact,
> almost
> >normal.
> >
> > Do you have enough information now to make a decision on your next
> >rotator?
> >
> >Cheers, Steve K7LXC
> >
> >--
> >FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
> >Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
> >Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
> >Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
> >Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
> >
> >
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm