[TowerTalk] klm kt34 baluns
Bob Wruble
ai7b@teleport.com
Sun, 23 Apr 2000 21:40:38 -0700
wx0b makes a great hi pwr 4:1 balun for the kt34xa's....
----- Original Message -----
From: <k6ll@juno.com>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2000 7:37 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] klm kt34 baluns
>
>
>
> On Sun, 23 Apr 2000 21:35:51 Mark Sihlanick <n2qt@pipeline.com> writes:
> >
> > I've got a kt34a and a kt34xa I'm refurbing. The klm supplied
> > baluns while
> > identical in appearance have a significant weight difference, 8.5 oz
> > vs 14
> > ozs. Being the inquisitive sort what makes the difference? Also
> > what is
> > the groups opinion on these baluns vs some other replacement?
>
> I put up a KT34xa in about 1980. Two years later, the plastic
> trap insulators had all deteriorated because of UV. One of the
> capacitors shorted, causing a high swr, which caused the original
> balun to fail. When I ordered a replacement from KLM, I was told
> that the new balun was more rugged than the original, had more
> cores, and could handle higher power. After replacing the balun
> and insulators in about 1982, the antenna has been up continuously
> ever since, with zero maintenance. I think both of those baluns
> are probably ok, but one is probably the older design. The old
> one handled a kw ok, until the swr went bananas from another
> cause.
>
>
> Dave Hachadorian, K6LL
> Yuma, AZ (The UV capital of the world)
> K6LL@juno.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
> Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
> Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm