[TowerTalk] T2X, new vs rebuilt

N2TK n2tk@earthlink.net
Mon, 24 Apr 2000 17:31:52 -0400


Depends on the environment. At V26B corrosion is our worst enemy followed by
failed direction pots. The terminal strips corrode so bad that the terminal
strips literally fall apart. That's why we are converting to pig tails as
the rotors fail. We don't have big beams so the wedges and gears hold up
fairly well.

Tony

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	owner-towertalk@contesting.com
[mailto:owner-towertalk@contesting.com]  On Behalf Of K7LXC@aol.com
Sent:	Monday, April 24, 2000 4:06 PM
To:	brunet@us.ibm.com; towertalk@contesting.com
Subject:	Re: [TowerTalk] T2X, new vs rebuilt


In a message dated 04/24/2000 12:38:32 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
brunet@us.ibm.com writes:

> Thanks for all the feedback.  The prime argument I have heard for using a
>  rebuilt is that one of the rebuilt options is to get it with a pigtail,
>  thus eliminating the terminal strip which apparently is the most common
>  failing component.

      Actually I've never seen a terminal strip "fail". Get real grungy and
eventually need replacing - yes, but fail - no. The majority failure modes
for Hy-Gains are brake wedges and ring gears.

>  Can a new one be modified to use a pigtail, thus bypassing the terminal
strip?

     Of course. When I was at Hy-Gain I tried to encourage the RotorDoc to
make one available. I don't know if there is one or if you have to do it
yourself. You just have to get inside to unsolder/resolder the wires. If it
was mine, I'd attach the pigtail to the terminal strip and then coat the
terminal strip with Liquid Electrical Tape. Very little work and you still
get control cable plugability.

> I suppose this would void the warranty; at
>  least in our situation where the work is being done by a contractor,
>  voiding the warranty would not be acceptable.

      Hard to say how MFJ handles this one. Use the 'pigtail on terminal
strip' scenario and you avoid this sticky situation.

Cheers,   Steve   K7LXC
Tower Tech

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm