[TowerTalk] Arrival angles and sunspot number
k6ll@juno.com
k6ll@juno.com
Tue, 25 Apr 2000 08:05:33 -0600
On Tue, 25 Apr 2000 10:32:15 -0400 "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
writes:
>
> > >But Pete, you have me confused. What is an isotropic source with
> > >gain, and how can you have one near earth?
> >
> > It's like an uggerumph, I suspect. In VOACAP, it is called a
> "constant
> > gain isotrope." If you could see it, it would look like a perfect
> > hemisphere with equal gain in every direction.
> >
> > The beauty, of course, is that it adds no biases to the
> propagation
> > prediction at all, other than whatever amount of path gain you add
> at
> > either end. No nulls at very low angles, or above the first lobe,
> to cut
> > into the received signal strength at those angles.
>
> Great! Now I see.
>
> What did that do to the wave angle predictions?
>
> My ARRL Antenna Book uses the "inverted V dipoles at 100 ft"
> antennas (which are really like a regular dipole at maybe 70 foot)
> for predictions for 80-30 meters.
>
> Is the newer info available somewhere without buying a new book?
The new files are on the ARRL web site somewhere, which happens
to be trashed by hackers this morning. I think they are located
under support for the YT program, if I remember correctly. Search
on YT?
If you tend to operate on the highest frequency band that is open,
as single-op contesters frequently do, then it may be better to
use the older files, except for ten meters. I think the new ones
include some high angle statistics that occur only when you are
operating far below the MUF.
Dave Hachadorian, K6LL
Yuma, AZ
K6LL@juno.com
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm