[TowerTalk] 4-Square Configurations
Michael Tope
Michael Tope <w4ef@pacbell.net>
Mon, 14 Aug 2000 06:24:59 -0700
Seems like that could be accomplished with a low
dipole and a power splitter. This arrangement
could be used only for xmit in order to preserve
the high angle rejection of the 4-sqr on rx.
Mike, W4EF........................................
----- Original Message -----
From: "Maurizio Panicara" <i4jmy@iol.it>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>; "Ralph Fedor" <rfedor@cloudnet.com>
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 3:02 AM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 4-Square Configurations
>
> Its useful to have a strong signal in Europe to send a sort of "stay away
> beacon" , but it's very risky and disadvantageuous when you don't have a
> separate receiving system (for DX) that rejects high angle waves.
>
> 73,
> Mauri I4JMY
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ralph Fedor" <rfedor@cloudnet.com>
> To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 4:53 AM
> Subject: [TowerTalk] 4-Square Configurations
>
>
>
> > An interesting argument for the elevated radial / ground screen
> > configuration is in ON4UN's book. The vertical radiators are cut for
SSB
> > and a stub is switched in and out of the SINGLE elevated radial beneath
> > each vertical radiator. The shorted stubs resonate the system at 3775;
> > with the stubs unshorted, the system resonates at 3525. John, ON4UN,
> > states there is some high angle radiation introduced when using this
> > configuration. In Europe, however, this is not so disadvantageous.
> > Thanks in advance for any comments.
> >
> > 73 -
> > Ralph - K0IR
> >
>
>
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
> Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com