Re[2]: [TowerTalk] KLM-KT34XA Vs. ?? Recommendations

R. Otto R. Otto" <N8NGA@one.net
Sun, 27 Aug 2000 22:37:55 -0400


Hello Ken,

It's interesting that you brought up the issue with 15M.  The
independant report I spoke of in an earlier post said the same thing.
The Champion Radio Report "HF Tribander Performance" by N0AX and K7LXC
noted when discussing Sum-of-Gain and Average Gain-per-band:

"The KT34XA is somewhat an underachiever in this particular set of
tests largely because of the strange behavior on 15-meters.  If the
gain figures on 15 had held up across the band, its Gs would likely be
0.5 to 1 dB higher - probably not enough to catch the leaders
however."

The information seems to corroborate your findings.

73's from.......

R. Otto
N8NGA@one.net
Cincinnati, Ohio

**********************************************
DXCC 10M         ** DX is !! **        WAS 10M
       There is a very fine line between
         "HOBBY" and "MENTAL ILLNESS"
**********************************************
When trouble arises and things look really bad,
there is always one individual who perceives a
solution and is willing to take command.
      VERY OFTEN THAT PERSON IS CRAZY!
**********************************************
Sunday, August 27, 2000, 4:08:21 PM, you wrote:


KE> Hi Paul,
KE> I recently took down a KT34XA adfter about 10 years of great service. The
KE> 20 section went to 3:1 and 10/15 even though good SWR were poor performers
KE> as of late.

KE> I solved my problem by going to the C36XR, which gives me a good 40 meter
KE> signal and 10,15, and 20. (Have a T-8 for WARC). My comparison of the XA
KE> would involve comparing with the T-8 (which is about one half the height
KE> 75'Vs 40').

KE> IMO, the C36XR is superior to the XA on 10 and 15 and slightly less on 20
KE> meters. Even when the XA was new, I never was real happy with reports on
KE> the 15 meter portion. This opinion is after some comparative analysis with
KE> the T-8. I might add I am very happy with the 40 meter portion of the 36XR.

KE> 73 Ken
KE> W0LSD


KE> At 03:17 PM 08/27/2000 -0400, you wrote:
>>
>>Getting ready to put tower back up... want to try something different...
>>what would the group recommend to try in place of the KT-34XA? I want
>>the following (will not even consider a quad):
>>
>>1. Equal to or better than specs/performance of the KT-34XA
>>
>>2. Would also like to have 12 & 17 Meters on same antenna...
>>
>>3. Plan on putting 2 or 3 elements on same tower/mast for 40 meters...
>>
>>4. Will entertain a used antenna IF in mint condition (prefer to
>>purchase a new one, however)
>>
>>--
>>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
>>Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
>>Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
>>Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
>>


KE> --
KE> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
KE> Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
KE> Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
KE> Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com