[TowerTalk] Hammers vs. Mosley

[John L. Hammers]

I want to thank you personally for the suggestion you mention below.
There is one little point that needs clarification though. I am NOT
the first that this has happenned to. It's just that I have nothing
to lose by telling my story while others (who have emailed me with
similiar stories of lesser dollar value) remain silent on the issue.
I have to repeat that the original Mosley antennas worked good and
past customer support was more than sufficient, just in my case with
this high priced antenna have these problems come to the surface.
If you or anyone else is interested, i will foward email sent to me
from Mosley and/or their attorney in an attempt to answer your questions.
happy holidays to everyone on the list
it is time for me to get another night of troubled sleep.
wa7aw
John H.
Mosley Contact info is:
mosley@mosley-electronics.com
1-800-325-4016
Please Don't harass Susan, She helps all she 
is allowed to and is just an employee.
 
At 11:54 PM 12/13/2000 -0800, you wrote:
>I have read all of Mr. Hammers posts. Seldom if ever do I comment about
>issues not of my business but this warrants a comment.
>After reading these for quite some time, we as a ham community should rally
>around our own. Whatever action that the legal community can offer is
>dwarfed by the power of public opinion/peer pressure on Mosley's sales
>base--our ham community. We as a group have a lot of clout with our profit
>motivated, amateur specific suppliers.
>I for one have no problem writing or calling Mosley and suggesting a
>solution in favor of Mr. Hammers. I would also make it a point to confront
>them personally in Dayton and ask for a straight answer. This could happen
>to any of us; and it will again. HOWEVER, if enough of us close ranks and
>protect our own in these instances, then we in aggregate are a powerful
>remedy.   Everyone call or write Mosley---Many small voices can make a lot
>of noise--Let them know that Boycotts trump Sales    Tommy  WD4K
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
>[mailto:owner-towertalk@contesting.com]On Behalf Of w0hh
>Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 8:51 PM
>To: Towertalk@contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Hammers vs. Mosley
>
>
>Gentlemen,
>
>The fact remains that Mr. Hammer says he is out $5K and the company has his
>antenna that he paid for. If it were my antenna, I would be on their
>doorstep with the sheriff. I would also sue their butts so quick the
>wouldn't know what hit them! A well known antenna company tried this crap
>with me about 3 years ago. I ended up getting everything I wanted and lots
>more. I believe Mr. Hammer is due a full refund based on his account of the
>situation.
>
>Tom W0HH
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
>Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
>Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
>
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
>Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
>Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
>
>



* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Pursuant to US Code, Title 47, Chapter 5, Subchapter II, '227,  *
* any and all unsolicited COMMERCIAL E-mail sent to this address  *
* is subject to a download and archival fee in the amount of $500 *
* US.  E-mailing denotes acceptance of these terms                *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com