[TowerTalk] towers/liability/permits/wind speed
Chanel1096@aol.com
Chanel1096@aol.com
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 11:38:59 EST
In a message dated 12/13/00 6:53:38 PM Eastern Standard Time,
jtolbert@gremlan.org writes:
> A recent cold front that moved through Northeastern Ohio and Northwestern Pa
> had wind gusts clocked at over 83 mph, sustained at 60+ for several hours.
> Talk on all the local repeaters and mailing lists centered around how much
> damage the local ham population suffered. Other than a local with an old
> Hustler vertical that broke no one that I am aware of suffered any damage
to
> their towers, certainly none of them fell over. This in spite of all the
> trees, power poles, tv antennas and even a cement retaining wall that fell
> on a police cruiser ( yes, parked at a donut shop. They were not injured
but
> their eyes were "glazed" over :) ) Food for thought next time a zoning
> board, insurance company or homeowners association questions the ability of
> a properly erected amateur tower to sustain heavy winds.
>
> 73 Jamie WW3S
>
Keep in mind however that the minimum sustained wind speed for the towers
should be 70 mph and the approximate equivalent gust is 90 mph. Based on
that a sustained wind speed on 65 mph puts only 86% of the load that a 70 mph
wind will with the differential between 83 and 90 mph being about 85%. So
all of the installations, if up to code should have readily survived the
storm that you mentioned.
-Bill
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com