[TowerTalk] HF Antenna Height.
Barry Kirkwood
bjk@ihug.co.nz
Sat, 23 Dec 2000 14:15:47 +1300
An interesting thread.
Many years ago the British publication "Short Wave Magazine" reprinted an
article from a DL source which looked at antenna height using a typical trap
tribander in terms of "bang for a buck". I cannot remember the precise
methodology, but believe it was based on pooled data of signal strengths
from a number of Eu stations. Remember that computer modelling of antenna
patterns was in its infancy at the time, and ionospheric prediction
simplistic by modern standards.
However, I do recall the result which indicated that around 45 ft height
gave a good result in that performance on 14, 21 and 28mHz fell off quite
rapidly below this level while incremental improvement with height above
this level was slower. ie. there was a gentle inflection in the curves
around 45ft.
FWIW, the conclusion was that where resources were limited the best return
for effort would be to go for a mast or tower height between 40-50ft.
73
Baz ZL1DD
end
Barry Kirkwood PhD ZL1DD
Signal Hill
66 Cory Road
Palm Beach
Waiheke Island 1240
NEW ZEALAND
www.waiheke.co.nz/signal.htm
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com