[TowerTalk] Stacked Beams, L-Networks, Matching Harnesses

Richard Thorne rthorne@tcac.net
Wed, 27 Dec 2000 11:45:59 -0600


Good post Jay.  Havn't been reading Ken's stuff.  His notes get deleted before
reading, not worth the time.

Jay Terleski wrote:

> K7GCO@aol.com wrote:
> >
> > ***********Jay: Let me make something very clear.  I'M NOT SELLING ANYTHING
> > ON TT OR ANYWHERE--YOU ARE.  I ONLY SUGGEST INEXPENSIVE CONCEPTS THAT I AND
> > OTHERS FIND VERY EFFECTIVE.  If they up-stage any proudcts for sale of yours
> > that's tough!  You know exactly what the "tuner of some type is" as I
> > described it to you a couple of times.  You put a very "deceptive spin on
> > your Poo Pooing."  These  inexpensive and simple concepts seems to upset you
> > financially more than any other way?  You keep ignoring the technical
> > aspects.
>
> No I tried to point out to you the following:
>
> 1. With LPDA or triband yagi stacks, the matching device ideally should
> be located in the physical middle of the stack. You cannot do this with
> your GCO adjustable network, with out an automatic phase mag detector to
> drive the capacitors. You already admitted this.
>
> 2. A GCO adjustable network is not going to be ideal over a 4 octave
> range. You fail to support your "technology" with anything you can
> publish.
>
> 3. A GCO adjustable network is too cumbersome to use. A contester will
> not accept the time it take to adjust it.
>
> 4. A GCO adjustable network cannot be adjusted fast enough to allow one
> to hear the best combinations of 2,3 or 4 antennas
>
> 5. A wide band transformer has none of these issues.
>
> 6. My customer require reliability and performance, I have to be able to
> replicate this with production quality components. You on the other hand
> maintain you can do it with floor sweepings.
> So be it.  You do not care if your stack goes down in a contest, and you
> do not have to build hundreds of them each year.
>
> Since you now choose to take this conversation into the mud by slinging
> your personal threats and challenging me on a personal level, I will bow
> out of this conversation and let you rant on.
>
> I hope that I have supported my thoughts clearly above once again to you
> and others.
>
> >From the many who have sent me private emails I thank you, and will do
> what most of you have said.
>
> Filter out "GCO".  What a shame Ken.
>
> It seems you at one time had a good technical background. But you must
> now make long and lengthy posts with little or nothing to say, then take
> it as a "Poo Pooing" if someone disagrees with you.
>
> I suggest you take the new years holiday to think about what it is you
> want to accomplish, and prioritize it.  Such as making that move,
> getting your circuits published, and or making antennas which you
> obviously love to do.
>
> If you want a forum to publish your Magical circuit I will be glad to
> post it on my web page in the "application notes" section. So others can
> "build it themselves" as you state is your intention. Then no one will
> have to send you a SASE with $2.00.  It will be free and open. I will
> put in the work to publish it as a schematic from my CAD software as
> well as other mechanical notes as you see fit.
>
> There you have it, simple and straight, no threats or animosity. Just an
> offer to help you.
>
> If you chose not to, then that tells us something too.
>
> 73 and HPY Ken. and to all the TTers who have put up with me.
>
> Jay, WX0B
>
> --
> Jay Terleski
> WX0B - Array Solutions
> www.arraysolutions.com
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
> Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com

--
73,
Richard Thorne
Amarillo, TX
Amateur Radio Station - N5ZC (Ex. KA2DSY, N2BHP, WB5M)
Remote Control Planes - AMA # 657062
Web Page: http://www.tcac.net/~rthorne/index.html



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com