[TowerTalk] Re: Copy Right Legalities
K7GCO@aol.com
K7GCO@aol.com
Sat, 26 Feb 2000 03:36:10 EST
In previous post the 1st paragraph was apparently to wide (same one I always
use) and produced shorten and uneven sentences which it doesn't always do.
Someone recommended immediately reducing the width and trying again. I
thank you. I tested it to him and it worked. Please discard previous
E-mail.
This a cleaner presentation.
W A N T E D: ATTORNEY HAM OF AT LEAST 25 YEARS, HIGHLY
EXPERIENCED IN COPY RIGHT, PATENT LAW AND MOLE HILL
MOUNTAIN CLIMBING, TO GIVE PRO BONO LAW OPINION (FREE)
ON TT OF MATTER TAKING UP TT SPACE THAT SHOULD BE USED
FOR AIRING USUAL BUT VERY USEFUL BAND-AIDS FOR
DEFICIENTLY DESIGNED EQUIPMENT AND OTHER VERY USEFUL
CORRECTIVE AND LONGEVITY CONCEPTS WE ALL LOVE TO USE.
IF POSTS BELOW AREN'T ENOUGH BAD EVIDENCE, THE REST
CAN BE SUBPOENAED. IN APPRECIATION, TT HAMDUMB--
(CORRECTION) HAMDOOM--HAMDOME--HAMDOM (TAKE YOUR
PICK) WILL PROVIDE PRO-BONO TECHNICAL (FREE TECHNICAL
ADVICE, ALUMINUM TUBING LIKE--6' x3/4"x.058"--OTHER PARTS
AND OTHER ASSISTANCE IF CLOSE) TO YOU IN EXCHANGE.
CERTAIN OF US WOULD EVEN APPEAR AS TECHNICAL
WITNESSES IN COURT FOR YOU IF EVER NEEDED. (WE
UNDERSTAND IF YOU WOULD PREFER TO DECLINE OUR
OFFER--PARTICULARLY FOR COURT). WE MUST SOLVE THIS
MONUMENTAL LEGAL COPYRIGHT MOLE HILL MADE TO A
MOUNTAIN PROBLEM AND WILL ALSO TELL NO MORE LAWYER
JOKES IF YOU SOLVE THE PROBLEM. OTHER LAWYERS
WILL LOVE YOU. IF YOU DON'T WE WILL CONTINUE AND TELL
EVEN MORE DUMB LAWYER JOKES. SUCH A DEAL!
(Why can't all the collective expertise on TT solve this simple legal
problem? Why don't we ask those who know when we don't--I even do that?
If
there is an Attorney Ham that reads this--why hasn't he volunteered advice?
Maybe there is a reason? K7GCO)
In a message dated 25.02.00 05:56:39 Pacific Standard Time,
Jan.E.Holm@telia.se writes:<<
How can the physical dimensions of an antenna be
copyrighted, please explain. I still insist, by the same token,
taking a picture of the same antenna must then be illegal.
Also I insist, if I hypothecicaly would build an EXACT
copy of an C31XR I might be walking on thin ice.
However I think it´s OK if I do so and only have it for
personal use. If I make an EXACT copy and start to
sell it I´m sure Force12 would sue me. In this case the above
wasn´t the issue. YU1AO only published a file with dimensions
for a C31XR and that surely cannot violate the copyright laws.
That's the BS old chap and no I don´t have to wish you 73 either
but since I´m a lot nicer then you I still will so a big
73 to you old chap. de Jim SM2EKM
------------------------------------
-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: davidw@copper.net [SMTP:davidw@copper.net]
Skickat: den 25 februari 2000 12:48
Till: Jan.E.Holm@telia.se
Ämne: RE: [TowerTalk] Re: C31XR?FINAL
Look, 'Jim':
What the YU published was copyrighted. *That's* what's at issue, so
your bombast is, as before, continuation of an attempt to defend the
indefensible. I quote the last paragraph of your intemperate response: "So
you see most of what you have been writing in this matter is *nothing*
like
pure BS." (emphasis mine). Yes, you're correct: no BS from this end.
BTW, your post puts me in company I admire. Did you forget to include
that response as well? *no* 73 K3BH
<<Fil: RE_ [TowerTalk] Re_ C31XR_FINAL.TXT>>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm