[TowerTalk] Was Advice - now crank-ups

K7LXC@aol.com K7LXC@aol.com
Wed, 19 Jan 2000 11:34:08 EST


In a message dated 00-01-19 11:01:27 EST, amcastmis@earthlink.net writes:

> A few things come to mind here.  First, freight companies never damage
>  tower sections of non-crank up towers?  Seems to me I've read of several
>  cases right here.

      Freight damage happens. It's *much* easier to spot bent metal on a 
single section than it is for a crank-up. Sometimes you don't know you have 
any damage until the first time you crank it up. 
>  
>  Second, the US Towers HDX series of crank up towers are rated at 30
>  sq.ft. of wind load up to 89 ft..  Not too many guyed towers can acheive
>  that.  At least not competitively priced ones.
>  
       ERRRHHHH! Yeah, 30 sq.ft. @ 60 MPH. That won't make the minimum for 
ANY building department permit in the country; the minimum is 70 MPH and it 
goes up from there. 

>  Third, here in CA on city sized lots, there just isn't room to properly
>  guy a tall tower, not to mention the additional attention that guy wires
>  might bring to the tower.

      There ARE valid reasons to install a crank-up. There are also valid 
reasons to install a self-supporter or a guyed tower. Only you as the owner 
can decide what's important for you and what you're willing to pay for it.

Cheers,   Steve   K7LXC
Tower Tech 

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm