[TowerTalk] A "good deal"
K7GCO@aol.com
K7GCO@aol.com
Fri, 28 Jan 2000 01:40:50 EST
In regard to W7LXC's recommendation of using Sliver Solder on a quads
twisted wire joints rather than regular solder and to not using Flee Market
Aluminum Solder on yagi tubing joints as I have SUCCESSFULLY DONE A 5 YEAR
LONGEVITY TEST ON and all the other comments--I have these comments.
I think Silver Solder (SS) is great if you can find a low temperature one.
The reference Silver Bearing Solder I got from Radio Shack came without any
flux. It don't stick. Unless there is a flux for it, forget it. Does anyone
know a better one? However for a twisted wire quad joint, I have yet to see
a twist wire joint under great stress soldered with normal solder ever fail
in 64 years. I see no need for SS on a quad zero resistance joint--the only
one each quad element has. As a result Quads have ZERO ELECTRICAL
DETERIORATION OF PERFORMANCE WITH ENAMELED OR COVERED WIRE. Yagi's can't say
that. Yagi construction needs lots of joints that can turn into resistors and
capacitors sooner or later--almost regardless what you use.
The best stuff I know about is called Anti-Seize with Aluminum in it and
it's gray. This has been very well tested. Rai-Beam supplies it with their
beams and it's costly. Longevity was built into this yagi throughout. The
Rai-Beam 2 element yagi and a properly designed 2 element quad are what I
call the "K7GCO New Standard of Beam Performance". To equal or beat them, you
have to go to a boom 2-3 times longer and 2-3 more elements to justify the
cost which starts to rise exponentially. The dB or 2 you might get will cost
you about $1-5000 or more depending on the band. The higher the gain the
higher it must be mounted to fully realize it's full performance.
I carefully pointed out that I solved this multiple joint problem with a
Flea Market Solder needing only a Berns-MaticTorch. It has survived 5 years
and it still looks great and tests "ZERO" resistance. What more can one ask?
In regard to manufacturers not recommending this, that would admit there
is a problem that they don't want you to know about or don't know themselves
how bad it can get. Take you pick. Even if the outside tubing is .058" wall
(or less), I oblong the inside tubing end or wrap tape around it to reduce or
eliminate any movement that would stress the solder joint or even a clamp
joint. I explained how I soldered it and it's passed the test of 5 years.
There were comments of using regular solders to aluminum joints that
don't stick. I soldered with a Berns-Matic Torch and Aluminum Solder that so
far as I know didn't weaken the tubing. I added a short length of a
mechanically secured small piece of thin tubing inside the joint near the end
of the element inside just to be on the safe side in case of a lowered
temper. If there is evidence it works and solves a major problem--don't
knock it unless you can prove it wrong. I never ever recommend anything that
I would bet money on and have not lost a bet.
I didn't add any rivets as I wanted to test its longevity without them.
That's not a bad idea to secure the element while soldering. If pop rivets
are used, be sure to use the ones with an aluminum nail in them. Rivets are
just another thing quad users don't have to worry about along with stripped
self taping screws and the Alumitoid Yagititis powder that forms around them.
There was one yagi 3 element design that had some 50 joints in it in an
Antenna Software sample program. It probably took a week to put it in there.
Few individuals would have all this different diameter tubing--I do. This
design required 50 SS clamps at considerable expense. For each SS Clamp
there are 2 RF connections--one on each side. There are 150 press fit
connections with 100 of being dissimilar metals. A quad only has the
feedline connections that should be coated. Unless the clamp and tubing is
coated there will be pits under it in time. I have great pictures of such a
problem. I plan to get them scanned for a web site. This design is the ALL
TIME 5 WORST DUMMITY DESIGNS I HAVE EVER SEEN.
Reflectors like this serve a useful purpose for tower and antenna
problems. I've seen many clever fixes and I read them all. When antenna
systems have nothing but problems with no end in sight, it's time to look at
other systems with known and proven performance and longevity concepts. They
don't require a Reflector for nonexistent problems. All this joint compound
coverage is of no interest to quad owners. We laugh at it and all the other
performance compromise problems with big HO HO HO's.
I've repeated the original solder suggestions below with an updated
version to make sure everyone understands what was said and.why it solves a
long time problem of every yagi. So far no useful corrections or suggestions
have been made and I welcome them all the time.
<<
True 'dat. Washington, DC HD's have unadvertised, unmarked specials of
NOALOX: normally $7.50, priced down to $5.15 for 8 oz. bottle w/applicator.
73 de Gene Smar AD3F
In a message dated 27.01.00 00:46:23 Pacific Standard Time, K7GCO@aol.com
writes: >>
One big advantage of a properly designed quad is each wire joint is
soldered giving Zero Resistance and it doesn't change. Instead of using
NOALOX or PENATROX on aluminum joints, I hear they work better on stiff knee
joints. This "Rheumatoid Arthritis" of the yagi joints is a serious plague
affecting all
aluminum joints--sooner or later. I call it "Alumitoid Yagititus."
I've checked many yagi joints over the years with an ohm and capacitive
meter and some become Capacitive Reactive. Fortunately for yagi's,
capacitive reactance does conduct RF but not without a length change.
Toward the end of an element bad joints tend to short out capacitively but
not in the high current area in the center. A capacitive joint would stop
DC. How deep the RF goes inside a tight capacitive joint I don't know due to
the limitations of the skin affect and the tight fit. It can throw off the
critical F/B tuning of a yagi which is easy to observe on the yagi sooner or
later. That loss of F/B is what first put me on the very trial of the dreaded
"Alumitoid Yagititis" some 50 years ago.
Other factors of performance are not as easy to measure. It doesn't
always change the SWR either I've found. Someone on TT said "certain DXer's
are taking their beams down and cleaning them before a contest." I started
recommending doing that over 50 years ago verbally and in print after what I
found--yes even with Penatrox. Some of the DXer's I told did it and thanked
me for it many times after. One competitive DXer suggested "I not tell
others"!! One high power W6 found Penatrox got hard in the joints and had to
file it off. So the question arises. Does RF flow in the joint despite the
well know skin affect? Why did this Penatrox get hard? Did high power "cook
it?" I tend to think there is a thin circular ring of conduction at the
diameter change. Only there is a low RF resistance joint needed unless the
field can jump a bad connection.
One 40 year old aluminum joint I took apart-with special leverages and
techniques-the Alumitoid Yagititus coating was .015" larger than tubing
diameter. The was a "compression fit." I finally cured the problem with a
Flea Market Aluminum Solder on telescoping joints. I cleaned the tubing
inside and out even with soap and water. I rotated 3/4" tubing in a lathe
slowly heating it and the 5/8" telescoping length with a Bernsamatic Torch.
It can be rotated in 2 V's by an assistant. At the right time or heat, it
flowed like regular solder. I don't know if any flowed inside the joint.
Larger tubing will require 2 torches. Result: INSTANT AND PERMANENT ZERO OHM
JOINTS that has lasted for 5 years. It's probably the first time this ever
happened. I mechanically secured a short length of 1/2" tubing for 6" past
the joint inside the 2' 5/8" end tubing as I wasn't sure what heating the
tubing would do to it's temper. I'm going to run a test on this. These are
the only yagi elements I have Zero Maintenance on except for the continuous
diameter elements I use on 10 and 12M. Aluminum welders should work
also--very quickly.
Part of this multiple joint resistance problem (every stainless steel
clamp adds even 2 more joints) is created by the length restrictions of
shipping
tubing in the mail (and airplane luggage for DX Expeditions). If I went on
a
DX Expedition I'd take quads as it's a better DX Antenna. It works very
well close to the ground also. Quad wire comes in long hanks, is cut to the
exact length and then it's PERMANENTLY SOLDERED. When aluminum elements are
damaged replacement aluminum is very very expensive. If quad wires are
damaged, it's replacement is very inexpensive. Telescoping fiberglass tubing
creates no performance problem as it does with yagi's. It's tapered nature
is ideal as it is with yagi elements.
There are still Quad manufacturers that cuts costs with minimum
mechanical and electrical designs to appeal to the tight budget buyers. Ham
Radio is living off the Retiree's and SS now and it's limited budget. They
also rely on the inability of their customers not to recognize the products
performance deficiencies. The root of the exposure problem is few have 2
towers
the same height for a comparison with a 2 element quad initially and long
term. It's
easy to compare 2 rigs in the shack with a coax switch. They have given the
quad a bad name it doesn't deserve. It even took me a long time to finally
see
the "Quad Light" with all the bad mouthing of quads going on created by bad
designs.
There is a Special Oven in Hell for these manufacturers along with the
buyers. Would you believe they still buy from each other down there. Their
Inter-Hell-Net Communication is on LSB Heat Waves. Solder joints go bad down
there all the time--like aluminum joints.
Gentlemen: It's time to review the facts of beam antenna performance.
Only with soldered aluminum and wire joints, there is no electrical
deterioration of a beams performance (except with the Gray Anti-Seize with
Aluminum in it and equivalents--it's still a press joint). I have yet to
read one bad report in TT or anywhere of electrical deterioration of quads
performance and or of
numerous mechanical problems of telephone poles which I have also
recommended. TT covers enough problems of metal towers and other antennas
that strongly suggests "better methods of enjoying Ham Radio should be
considered." Retiree's I know can't do the constant maintenance needed with
metal towers and yagi's after 10-15 years nor can they afford hiring it
done. Longevity of design has been missing from many antennas. Ask yourself
"if a problem developed in the yagi--how many months would it take before it
could be fixed and how much would it cost?". Weather permitting I can do it
right away even at night. I have flood lights and head mounted flashlights.
K7GCO
>>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm