[TowerTalk] A "good deal"
K7GCO@aol.com
K7GCO@aol.com
Fri, 28 Jan 2000 04:58:37 EST
NOTE! My face is read. As a speed reader I can miss spelling or the wrong
word.
A few paragraphs down I capitalized the correct word. The "dumb word
checker" didn't catch the word "would". Disregard previous Post. I made
some other improvements.
k7gco
In a message dated 27.01.00 22:41:51 Pacific Standard Time, K7GCO@aol.com
writes:
In regard to W7LXC's recommendation of using Sliver Solder on a quads
twisted wire joints rather than regular solder and to not using Flee Market
Aluminum Solder on yagi tubing joints as I have SUCCESSFULLY DONE A
5 YEAR LONGEVITY TEST ON and all the other comments--I have these
comments.
I think Silver Solder (SS) is great if you can find a low temperature
one.
The reference Silver Bearing Solder I got from Radio Shack came without any
flux. It don't stick. Unless there is a flux for it, forget it. Does
anyone
know a better one? However for a twisted wire quad joint, I have yet to see
a twisted wire joint under great stress soldered with normal solder ever
fail
in 64 years. I see no need for SS on a quad wire joint as both give zero
resistance for a long time--the only joint each quad element has. As a
result
Quads have ZERO ELECTRICAL DETERIORATION OF PERFORMANCE
WITH ENAMELED OR COVERED WIRE. Yagi's can't say that. Yagi
construction needs lots of joints that can turn into resistors and capacitors
sooner or later--almost regardless what you use.
The best stuff I know about is called Anti-Seize with Aluminum in it and
it's gray. This has been very well tested. Chuck Smith of Rai-Beam supplies
it with his newly patented beams beams and it's costly--the Aniti-Seize that
is. Longevity was built into this yagi throughout. The Rai-Beam 2 element
yagi and a properly designed 2 element quad are what I call the "K7GCO
New Standard of Beam Performance". To equal or beat them, you have to
go to a boom 2-3 times longer and 2-3 more elements to justify the
cost which starts to rise exponentially. The dB or 2 you might get will
cost
you about $1-5000 or more depending on the band. It's a lot of "dB's of $$$"
more. This is a new term I just coined. The higher the gain the higher it
must be mounted to fully realize it's full performance.
I carefully pointed out that I solved this multiple joint problem with a
Flea
Market Solder needing only a Berns-MaticTorch. It has survived 5 years
and it still looks great and tests "ZERO" resistance. What more can one
ask?
In regard to manufacturers "not recommending this", that would admit
there
is a problem they don't want you to know about or don't know themselves
how bad it can get. Take you pick. Even if the outside tubing is .058" wall
(or less), I oblong the inside tubing end or wrap tape around it to reduce
or
eliminate any movement that would stress the solder joint or even a clamp
joint. I explained how I soldered it and it's passed the test of 5 years.
There were comments of using regular solders to aluminum joints that
don't stick. I soldered with a Berns-Matic Torch and a no flux Aluminum
Solder that so far as I know didn't weaken the tubing. I added a short
length of a mechanically secured small piece of thin tubing inside the joint
near the end of the element inside just to be on the safe side in case of a
lowered temper. If there is evidence it works and solves a major problem
--don't knock it unless you can prove it wrong. You might even try it. I
never ever recommend anything that I WOULDN'T bet money on and
have not lost a bet.
I didn't add any rivets as I wanted to test its longevity without them.
That's not a bad idea to secure the element while soldering. If pop rivets
are used, be sure to use the ones with an aluminum nail in them. Rivets are
just another thing quad users don't have to worry about along with stripped
self taping screws and the Alumitoid Yagititis powder that forms around them.
There was one yagi 3 element design that had some 50 joints in it in an
Antenna Software sample program. It probably took a week to put it in
there.
Few individuals would have all this different diameter tubing--I do. This
design required 50 SS clamps at considerable expense. For each SS
Clamp there are 2 RF connections--one on each side. There are 150 press fit
connections with 100 of them being dissimilar metals. A quad only has the
feedline connections that should be coated. Unless the clamp and tubing is
coated there will be pits under it in time. I have great pictures of such
problems. I plan to get them scanned for a web site. This design is the
ALL
TIME 5 WORST DUMMITY DESIGNS I HAVE EVER SEEN.
Reflectors like this serve a useful purpose for tower and antenna
problems. I've seen many clever fixes and I read them all. When antenna
systems have nothing but problems with no end in sight, it's time to look at
other systems with known and proven performance and longevity concepts. They
don't require a Reflector for nonexistent problems. All this joint compound
coverage is of no interest to quad owners. We laugh at it and all the other
performance compromise problems with big HO HO HO's.
I've repeated the original solder suggestions below with an updated
version to make sure everyone understands what was said and.why it solves a
long time problem of every yagi. So far no useful corrections or
suggestions
have been made and I welcome them all the time.
<<
True 'dat. Washington, DC HD's have unadvertised, unmarked specials of
NOALOX: normally $7.50, priced down to $5.15 for 8 oz. bottle w/applicator.
73 de Gene Smar AD3F
In a message dated 27.01.00 00:46:23 Pacific Standard Time, K7GCO@aol.com
writes: >>
One big advantage of a properly designed quad is each wire joint is
soldered giving Zero Resistance and it doesn't change. Instead of using
NOALOX or PENATROX on aluminum joints, I hear they work better on stiff
knee joints. This "Rheumatoid Arthritis" of the yagi joints is a serious
plague affecting all aluminum joints--sooner or later. I call it
"Alumitoid
Yagititus." I've checked many yagi joints over the years with an ohm and
capacitive meter and some become Capacitive Reactive. Fortunately for
yagi's, capacitive reactance does conduct RF but not without a length
change.
Toward the end of an element bad joints tend to short out capacitively but
not in the high current area in the center where it does the most damage.
A capacitive joint would stop DC. We are a littler higher than that. How
deep
the RF goes inside a tight capacitive joint I don't know due to the
limitations
of the skin affect and the tight fit. It can throw off a critical F/B
tuning of a
yagi which is easy to observe on the yagi--sooner or later. That loss of
F/B
is what first put me on the very trial of the dreaded "Alumitoid Yagititis"
some 50 years ago. It's the first thing I look for.
Other factors of performance are not as easy to measure. It doesn't
always change the SWR either I've found. Someone on TT said "certain
DXer's are taking their beams down and cleaning them before a contest."
I started recommending doing that over 50 years ago verbally and in print
after what I found--yes even with Penatrox. Some of the DXer's I told did
it
and thanked me for it many times after. One competitive DXer suggested
"I not tell others"!! One high power W6 found Penatrox got hard in the
joints
and had to file it off. So the question arises. Does RF flow in the
joint
despite the well know skin affect? Why did this Penatrox get hard? Did
high power "cook it?" I tend to think there is a thin circular ring of
conduction at the diameter change. Only there is a low RF resistance
joint
needed unless the field can jump a bad connection. Six-40 year old
aluminum joints I took apart--with special leverages and techniques--the
Alumitoid Yagititus coating was .015" larger than tubing diameter. The was
a "compression fit." I finally cured the problem with a Flea Market
Aluminum
Solder on telescoping joints. I cleaned the tubing inside and out even with
soap and water. I rotated 3/4" tubing in a lathe slowly heating it and the
5/8"
telescoping length with a Bernsamatic Torch. It can be rotated in 2 V's by
an assistant. At the right time or heat, it flowed like regular solder. I
don't
know if any flowed inside the joint. Larger tubing will require 2 torches.
Result: INSTANT AND PERMANENT ZERO OHM JOINTS that has lasted for 5
years. It's probably the first time this ever happened. I mechanically
secured
a short length of 1/2" tubing for 6" past the joint inside the 2' 5/8" end
tubing
as I wasn't sure what heating the tubing would do to it's temper. I'm
going to
run a test on this. These are the only yagi elements I have Zero
Maintenance
on except for the continuous diameter elements I use on 10 and 12M.
Aluminum welders should work also--very quickly.
Part of this multiple joint resistance problem (every stainless steel
clamp adds even 2 more joints) is largely created by the length
restrictions
of shipping tubing in the mail (and airplane luggage for DX Expeditions).
If I
went on a DX Expedition I'd take quads as it's a better DX Antenna. It
works
very well close to the ground also. Quad wire comes in long hanks, is cut
to
the exact length and then it's PERMANENTLY SOLDERED. When aluminum
elements are damaged replacement aluminum is very very expensive. If quad
wires are damaged, it's replacement is very inexpensive. Telescoping
fiberglass tubing creates no performance problem as it does with yagi's.
It's
tapered nature is ideal for strength as it is with yagi elements.
There are still Quad manufacturers that cuts costs with minimum
mechanical and electrical designs to appeal to the tight budget buyers. Ham
Radio is living off the Retiree's and SS now and it's limited budget. They
also rely on the inability of mostly non-technical customers not to
recognize
the products performance deficiencies. The root of the exposure problem is
few have 2 towers the same height for a comparison with a 2 element quad
initially and long term. It's easy to compare 2 rigs in the shack with a
coax
switch. The "deficient design merchants" have given the quad a bad name it
doesn't deserve. It even took me a long time to finally see the "Quad
Light"
with all the bad mouthing of quads going on created by bad designs.
There is a Special Oven in Ham Hell for these manufacturers along with
the
buyers who get suckered in. They go straight to Ham Hell also and don't
pass
the Good Stuff Stores. Would you believe they still buy from each other
down
there as their over heated Ovens are adjacent to each other. Their Inter
Hell
Net Communication is on LSB Heat Waves. Solder joints go bad down there
all the time--like aluminum joints.
Gentlemen: It's time to review the facts of beam antenna performance.
Are
you getting a Top Design with Longevity built in for the money? Only with
soldered aluminum and wire joints, there is no electrical deterioration of
a
beams performance (except with the Gray Anti-Seize with Aluminum in it and
equivalents--it's still a press joint). I have yet to read one bad report
in TT or
anywhere of electrical deterioration of quads performance and or of numerous
mechanical problems of telephone poles which I have also recommended. TT
covers enough problems of metal towers and other antennas that strongly
suggests "better methods of enjoying Ham Radio should be considered."
Retiree's I know can't do the constant maintenance needed with metal towers
and yagi's after 10-15 years nor can they afford hiring it done. Longevity
of
Design has been missing from many antennas. Ask yourself "if a problem
developed in your yagi--how many days, weeks or months would it take before
it could be fixed and how much would it cost?". Weather permitting I can
do it
right away even at night. I have flood lights and head mounted flashlights.
Your Montra should be every night "Think Longevity." Repeat it until you
go to
sleep. K7GCO Ken Glanzer
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm