[TowerTalk] 25G vs 45G
James Sawyer
wa6znm@jps.net
Wed, 12 Jul 2000 18:07:51 -0700
Go with 45G.
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
[mailto:owner-towertalk@contesting.com]On Behalf Of J.P.
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 5:39 PM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 25G vs 45G
Greetings:
> I am getting ready to put up my first "real" tower. I am trying to decide
> between Rohn 25G and 45G. On the Rohn website, the windload specs for 25
and
> 45 are virtually the same at 80 feet. Is this true? How can this be
correct?
If you look closer at the Rohn book, the 45G spec shows an additional 8 SQ
feet
already factored into the allowable load rating for antenna standoff's at
the
top. Presumably, these would be for a commercial tower, where you would
have several (Rohn specs 3) of these at the top to mount VHF/UHF sticks
or what have you.
In the ham calculation, you can add these 8 SQ feet to the allowable wind
load,
and then you see that 45G is much stronger than 25G at any wind speed.
73, J.P. W2XX
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com