[TowerTalk] [Fwd: Beam headings]

kimba@sprint.ca kimba@sprint.ca
Wed, 15 Mar 2000 20:09:15 -0500

Received: from altweb.ott.igs.net (altweb.ott.igs.net [])
	by hme0.smtp04.sprint.ca (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA09501
	for <kimba@sprint.ca>; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 20:02:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: from hme0.mailrouter02.sprint.ca (hme0.mailrouter02.sprint.ca [])
	by altweb.ott.igs.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA28580
	for <ve3qaa@rac.ca>; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 20:02:09 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from kimba@sprint.ca)
From: kimba@sprint.ca
Received: from default (spc-isp-mtl-58-8-23.sprint.ca [])
	by hme0.mailrouter02.sprint.ca (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id UAA11754
	for <ve3qaa@rac.ca>; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 20:02:02 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <38D0326E.59EB@sprint.ca>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 20:02:53 -0500
Reply-To: kimba@sprint.ca
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.02 (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ve3qaa@rac.ca
Subject: Beam headings
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Since this thread seems to be generating a lot of interest, I thought I
had better put in my two cent's worth.  

Several years ago I decided I would establish a baseline down my poperty
that could be used for all time for any antenna I wanted to aim,
including an 800 foot long rhombic.  Within a half hour one evening I
established this baseline to an accuracy of 2 or 3 minutes of arc!
Now I know that this accuracy is completely unnecessary for any antenna,
and my only excuse was the challenge - i.e. "it was there".

I borrowed a surveyors transit, obtained a copy of software called
'astrocalc' which gives the position of the planets, etc. as a function
of time, a copy of the Astronomical Almanac, a conversion of sidereal to
EDST for that day, and an accurate watch.

At dusk I sighted on Saturn (an unmistakable sight, even with the modest
telescope on the transit), and recorded its position on the transit's
scale at a precise time.  This gave a reading of 51 degrees, 46.8
minutes for the baseline.

I then sighted on Polaris, and using the corrections in the Astronomical
Almanac, determined a bearing of 51 degrees, 42.9 minutes. 

I rounded the average of these to 51 degrees, 45 minutes, plus or minus
3 minutes, as the bearing of my baseline.

Finally, the bearing was taken using the compass on the transit. 
Applying the magnetic declination correction for this location and date,
I obtained a bearing within about three quarters of a degree of the
'true' bearing.

I make no claim that this exercize was necessary, but as I said, I did
it "because it was there". The compass reading would have been quite

Incidentally, contrary to what has been said, a correction for sidereal
time AND latitude is necessary to obtain an accurate reading for
Polaris.  This star circles about a point in the sky directly above the
axis of the Earth, with a radius of about a degree. But the difference
of the bearing from true north can exceed this.  Consider an extreme
case, observing Polaris from a location within a degree of the pole.  At
times it will be due south! This would require a correction of 180

Bert,  VE3QAA

FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm