[TowerTalk] Hi-Tech Station Cost
Tom Rauch
W8JI@contesting.com
Wed, 24 May 2000 07:34:51 -0400
It appears we read far too many advertisements, and take them far
too seriously!!!
<italic><color><param>0000,0000,0000</param>> To put this estimate in even more prospective, one can install a 5 band 2
> element quad (I've added 6M also) with individually driven DE's with a
> coax switch at the beam like Antenna Mart has, a 35-50' tower next to the
> house, rotator and coax for about $1500 which is a great bargain. This
> will work the world like few have ever experienced with virtually no
> maintenance. They are built for Longevity and retiree
> budgets--physically, financially and socially.
</italic></color>At some heights, a two element quad has just over one dB gain
advantage over a two element yagi. At some heights, there is no
advantage at all. So the real gain advantage of a two element quad
over a two element yagi is somewhere between zero and just over
one dB! Of course the advantage is less with a larger antenna.
<italic><color><param>0000,0000,0000</param>
> To beat this beam or similar ones like the RaiBeam or HexBeam (or Moxon
> who no one builds commercially), you need mono-banders of more elements,
> all the associated costs, the land and permission to install it all
> physically and financially from you know who--the XYL. They frequently
> don't like the looks of this new aluminum mistress and it's cost in money
> and time. If the wife ever saw what it really costs for a few more Ego
> Boasting dB's toy that reduced your time with her, you could lose it all
> in a divorce.
</italic></color>Two element beams work like two element beams. Two element
shortened beams work like two element shortened beams.
It's certainly possible to have a yagi or quad antenna that is a "dog"
due to poor construction or installation, but it is absolutely NOT
possible to have one that breaks the laws of electromagnetics and
works better than a longer boom antenna that is properly
constructed and installed.
<italic><color><param>0000,0000,0000</param>
> For 20-30 dB more $$$, all you gain is 2-4 more "line of sight gain",
> sharpening of the vertical pattern which gives what I call more "DX Gain"
> based on many comparisons and a lower angle of radiation which puts one in
> sooner and holds one in later needed to be competitive in contests. You
> will hear stuff the lower ones don't hear. The lower and fewer element
> beams seem to take over during the day in the contest. So all this
> investment only really helped your signal mostly during the opening and
> closing of the band. Disturbing isn't it?
</italic>$15k-$150k (assuming you are talking dB as in power ratio, not
voltage or current ratios) is a wide range in cost. </color>
My HF antennas, basically four element monobanders from
Force12 and a three element yagi on 40, will work better all through
band openings than any two element quad, yagi, or shortened yagi
at equal height no matter what any advertising department would
have us believe....and they cost a whole lot less than the $15k
lower limit you set.
It's mostly a fantasy created in marketing departments and
repeated by people who own the small "magic" antennas that small
antennas, through some black-magic buzz-word science that
amounts to shaking a dead chicken over hot coals, can out-perform
a properly constructed larger antenna under any typical operating
conditions.
<italic><color><param>0000,0000,0000</param>> Now there are a couple a ways to get a lower angle of radiation from lower
> heights. Vertically polarized beams is one. (The others are trade
> secrets?)
</italic></color>Maybe on 160 meters or 80 meters that would work, but we'd loose
ground reflection gain with vertical polarization on higher
frequencies. You might lower the angle of maximum radiation, but
the absolute level of signal...the only important parameter....would
also be less.
As to the "trade secrets", you can be sure the special claims are
really "trade fantasies" written by advertising departments.
<nofill>
73, Tom W8JI
w8ji@contesting.com
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm