[TowerTalk] Pier pin vs. burying in concrete
Chuck O'Neal
coneal@ma.ultranet.com
Thu, 31 May 2001 19:22:08 -0400
Thank you folks!
Interesting comments. A good summary of concerns
regarding my original question can be found at:
http://www.qth.com/ka9fox/pier_pin_vs_embedded_base.txt
This was referred to me by another list member. I asked
the question since I've been a pier pin user and now am
be putting up another group of towers. Just wondered if anything
was new! As an aside, I had a 3E 75 M yagi on 110' of
Rohn 45 for 8 years, a modified KLM beam, and it went through a
100+ MPH hurricane (Gloria) and the tower twisted +/- 30 deg
at the top, and the pier pin, the flat plate on the concrete,
was moving +/- 10 deg or so...quite scary but the whole system
survived! The plate on the concrete was sitting on a disk of 1/8"
thick SS (304) about 10" in dia. This allows rotation at the base
which provides the degree of freedom necessary for the pier pin
approach to work, I believe. The flat plate supplied by Rohn
I think negates the advantage when placed on concrete
unless one provides a "bearing" surface with some "give to it.
73,
Chuck...K1KW
List Sponsor: Are you thinking about installing a tower this summer? Call us
for information on our fabulous Trylon Titan self-supporting towers - up to
96-feet for less than $2000! at 888-833-3104 <A HREF="http://www.ChampionRadio.com">
www.ChampionRadio.com</A>
-----
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com