[TowerTalk] Look at his response

[Bill Aycock]

Joe- Don't misunderstand me- I do NOT think it should have been posted to 
TT. For several reasons, none of which label that  silly pic as 
"Pornography".
Bill

At 08:49 AM 2/23/2004 -0700, you wrote:

>It does - thanks for the pity, but I don't need it.  Save it for those 
>young hams who click on the link and, as their parents walk into the room, 
>suffer the consequences.  This reflector isn't just for us old poops who 
>have seen it all.  I'd hope that youngsters frequent this tower of 
>knowledge too.  And therein lies the basis for my objections.
>
>73
>Joe
>WD0M
>
>At 10:49 PM 2/22/2004, Bill Aycock wrote:
>
>
>>If that photo fits your definition of pornography, I pity you- if there 
>>are many with that view, I pity the rest of us.
>>Bill
>>
>>
>>At 06:45 PM 2/22/2004 -0700, you wrote:
>>
>>>I'll consider the source.......anyone who would support sending pornographic
>>>links into untold homes across the world where YOUNG HAMS can subscribe to
>>>this reflector has no class.
>>
>>
>>Bill Aycock - W4BSG
>>Woodville, Alabama
>
>

Bill Aycock - W4BSG
Woodville, Alabama