[TowerTalk] Problems on a 2el vertical Array
Tobias Wellnitz
T.Wellnitz at gmx.de
Sat Jan 10 05:41:26 EST 2004
Hi Jim & all,
thanks alot for your help. I'm just trying to write a little bit more
detailed document about my experiments with the verticals.
In order to conentrate on the main problem, I didn't tell that my
array was a little bit bigger.
I set up 3 verticals in a isosceles
<http://dict.leo.org/?p=lURE.&search=isosceles> triangle
<http://dict.leo.org/?p=lURE.&search=triangle>. At any time I'm using
two 2 verticals. This gives me 6 directions.
I can supply more informations (pattern, NEC files, messurements,
pictures...etc)
but let me just quote your comments:
>Close in contacts (or two bounce contacts) will have a high elevation angle,
>so the relative phasing of the antennas is not as optimized as for a low
>angle propagation. Essentially, the antennas are closer together by
>cos(elevation angle).
>
>
Right. Anyway, I should have in *all* situations more than 6dB f/b ratio.
(according to the antenna pattern)
>>Right now I have two possible answers / questions:
>>
>>1. Is this the typical behavior of a 2el vertical Array ?
>>
>>
>
>If your measured data matches theoretical expectations within 3 dB, on an HF
>antenna over real ground, I'd be pretty happy. Null depth (driving F/B) is
>the first thing to suffer.
>
>Consider also that the incoming wavefront is NOT a nice flat idealized
>wavefront, but varies with time and probably has local wiggles.
>
>Have you tried setting things up so you can swap front and back directions
>to measure f/b directly?
>
Yes, of course. I made two switching boxes:
1. 2el Array (2 switchable directions + single vertical)
2. 3el Array (6 switchable directions)
73 Toby, DH1TW
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list