[TowerTalk] Re: Tower bolts
Jim Schnaidt
kj0m at mchsi.com
Thu Sep 30 19:28:00 EDT 2004
On Sep 30, 2004, at 5:26 PM, towertalk-request at contesting.com wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Al Williams [mailto:alwilliams at olywa.net]
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 12:18 PM
> To: Bill Turini; towertalk at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] RE: Tower bolts
>
> I don't know if the UST supplied bolts for the HDX572 are identical or
> similar to those used for the TX-472 but if they are;
> they are not ordinary straight bolts but rather are in the shape of a
> J.
> The bottom of the J is only 27" overall with only 22" embedded
> in the concrete. The foundation stress analysis claims a Pullout
> Capacity = 258,490 pounds and states it is OK. I can't determine
> anything in the tower stress analysis that shows what the pullout
> stress
> is. Perhaps someone can explain what benefit is obtained by having the
> bolts bent into a J in the concrete.
>
> Also, is the UST supplied stress analysis valid if the J bolts are
> replaced with straight bolts? What effect would that have on a
> building
> permit and an insurance claim if the tower failed?
>
> k7puc
>
When I installed my TX-472 MDP 2 years ago, US Tower sent me 3 bolts, 1
1/4", I think 27" long and straight. These did not have a J or L, they
were straight, threaded rods. They did have 2 nuts on the end that was
embedded in the concrete and 2 nuts on the tower end. I can't imagine
pulling those nuts out of 20+ inches of concrete. I'm not sure why they
didn't use J or L bolts, but then again, I can't imagine they'd have
sent the wrong ones.
73,
Jim
KJ0M
._._.
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list