[TowerTalk] Rohn wasn't perfect-- can we end this please?
Doug Renwick
ve5ra at sasktel.net
Thu Feb 10 15:08:05 EST 2005
John,
Please refrain from trying to turn speculation into fact. You obviously
side with KQ2M. You and I do not know the facts! To pretend that you
do, only adds 'wood to the fire'. On one hand you say 'it is enough'
and then you proceed to pick on K4IDC. We know by his unnecessarily
long and vicious email that KQ2M has problems. Please keep your politics
off Tower Talk.
Doug/VA5DX
kk9a at arrl.net wrote:
> I agree that since this thread started several months ago it is enough (or
> enuf, as many spell it) on the subject. I disagree that this does not
> belong on towertalk, however the name calling certainly does not belong
> here. If a vendor offers poor service or worse yet poor quality we should
> be informed. Obviously, KQ2M is pretty upset and this could easily be
> resolved if K4IDC (ex KB4IDC) would simply accept the return of
> merchandise. If it's true that KQ2M expected to get Rohn torque bars and
> hardware and instead got something fabricated by K4IDC using lesser quality
> hardware, this is fraud. A number of people seem happy with K4IDC's
> products, however it's possible that they did not notice grade 2 bolts
> instead of Rohn spec grade 5 and perhaps didn't expect Rohn brackets. Since
> this is a safety related item, it should definitely be brought to everyone's
> attention. If you choose to purchase from K4IDC , great, just be sure you
> know exactly what you are buying.
>
> 73,
> John KK9A
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list