[TowerTalk] geo888@cs.com

[Mike D.]

> From: Alan Zack [mailto:k7acz at cox.net] 

> That would mean everyone using CALLSIGN at arrl.net, 
> CALLSIGN at jarl.net, CALLSIGN at darc.net, etc., would be dropped.

It would mean that everyone using an alias account would have to resubscribe
using their "real" e-mail address. It would not prohibit anyone from
enjoying the benefits of TowerTalk, that is currently enjoying it. 

It would also mean that the [geo888 at cs.com] bounced messages would finally
stop. It would also mean that someone else's bounced messages won't start up
at a later date. It will also mean that eventually this discussion would
end.

73 de Mike, N9BOR
A-1, FISTS, JARL A-1, SMC
http://www.n9bor.us
http://www.k9ya.org

di dah dit - The only Roger Beep you'll ever need.
Let your fingers do the talking - Morse code.
My designated driver is a 12BY7A. 

> Mike D. wrote:
> 
> > Jim,
> > 
> > Thanks for your note. Yes, you, et al, might "like" using an alias 
> > e-mail account, but that is the problem. Your unwillingness to be 
> > slightly inconvenienced, when/if you ever change your 
> e-mail provider 
> > is probably the same reason [geo888 at cs.com] subscribed using his.
> > 
> > There are probably 700+ subscribers to TowerTalk. The few 
> subscribers 
> > using alias accounts are apparently unwilling to be personally 
> > inconvenienced, yet are also bothered by NEVER ENDING 
> bounces to every 
> > contributor. There is no way to test every subscribed 
> e-mail address. 
> > If there were, the MAILMAN software would have removed the 
> offending 
> > address a long time ago. It is automatic-I administer seven 
> Ham Radio lists using this application.
> > 
> > The only practical solution is for the list administrator to 
> > unsubscribe every known e-mail forwarding address and 
> restrict future 
> > subscriptions from those addresses.
> > 
> > 73 de Mike, N9BOR
> > A-1, FISTS, JARL A-1, SMC
> > http://www.n9bor.us
> > http://www.k9ya.org